A Prospective Comparative Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Transurethral Thulium Fiber Laser, Holmium Laser and Bipolar Enucleation of Large Sized Prostate
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 90
- 试验地点
- 1
研究概览
简要总结
This study compares the safety and efficacy of three endoscopic enucleation techniques for large prostates (>100 mL) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation (ThuFLEP), Holmium Laser Enucleation (HoLEP), and Bipolar Enucleation (B-TUEP). Ninety male patients with severe lower urinary tract symptoms (IPSS ≥20, Qmax ≤10 mL/s) who failed medical therapy will be randomized 1:1:1 into three groups of 30. Primary outcomes include IPSS, quality of life score, maximum flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include operative time, enucleation efficiency, blood loss, catheterization duration, hospital stay, and complication rates assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification.
详细描述
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a progressive condition causing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) that significantly impairs quality of life in aging men. While medical therapy with alpha-blockers and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors represents first-line management, surgical intervention becomes necessary when symptoms are severe or complications arise.
Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate has emerged as the size-independent gold standard surgical approach. This prospective randomized controlled trial will be conducted at the Urology Department, Tanta University Hospital (October 2025 - October 2027) following IRB approval (Code: 36265MD479/10/25).
Patients will undergo preoperative evaluation including IPSS, QoL index, IIEF-5, uroflowmetry, transrectal ultrasound, PSA, CBC, coagulation profile, and renal/liver function tests. Intraoperative data will include total operative time, enucleation time, morcellation time, enucleation efficiency (g/min), and estimated blood loss. Postoperative follow-up at 1, 3, and 6 months will assess IPSS, QoL, IIEF-5, Qmax, and post-void residual. Complications will be graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Randomization will use the sealed opaque envelope method with 1:1:1 allocation.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 性别
- Male
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Male patients diagnosed with BPH
- •Clinical diagnosis of BPH with lower urinary tract symptoms.
- •IPSS ≥ 20 (severe symptoms)
- •Maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) ≤ 10 mL/s
- •Prostate volume >100 mL (measured by transrectal ultrasound)
- •Failed medical therapy and fit for operation
排除标准
- •Prostate cancer (current or history).
- •Previous prostate surgery
- •Previous urethral surgery.
- •Neurogenic bladder dysfunction.
- •Active urinary tract infection.
- •Severe cardiovascular disease (ASA Class IV).
- •Previous pelvic radiation.
- •Urethral stricture
- •Urinary bladder stones.
研究者
Abdullah Salah Al Debeiky
Lecturer of Urology
Tanta University