跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04975789
NCT04975789已完成不适用

Information Visualization to Improve Pain Communication Between Providers, Interpreters, and Patients With Limited English Proficiency

University of Wisconsin, Madison2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 61 人开始时间: 2021年10月7日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
61
试验地点
2
主要终点
Percentage of Eligible Patients Enrolled

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to pilot test a pain assessment information visualization (InfoViz) tool to facilitate communication about pain severity, location, and quality to increase mutual understanding between patients with limited English proficiency (LEP), interpreters, and providers during pain assessment. 40 participants will be enrolled and can expect to be on study for up to 4 weeks.

详细描述

The purpose of this study is to pilot test a pain assessment information visualization (InfoViz) tool to facilitate communication about pain severity, location, and quality to increase mutual understanding between patients with limited English proficiency (LEP), interpreters, and providers during pain assessment.

The investigators focus on the LEP Hmong because pain is particularly problematic for this group. The Hmong describe pain using visual metaphors that are inconsistent with providers' knowledge and interpreters struggle to translate metaphors accurately between patients and providers. The goals of the study are (1) to examine the feasibility of implementing the pain InfoViz tool, (2) to explore congruency of patient-interpreter-provider triads' mutual understanding (MU) of pain severity, location, and quality, and (3) to evaluate outcome measures selected to capture satisfaction with communication, pain relief, and pain interference with life and explore variables identified in the InfoViz tool conceptual framework (MU of pain assessment information, satisfaction with communication, pain diagnosis and treatment).

The investigators will first collect data from 20 participants under the usual care control condition (i.e., interpreters verbally interpreting and communicating pain descriptions), followed by data collection from another 20 participants under the intervention condition (i.e., interpreters using verbal descriptions and the InfoViz tool).

The investigators believe that the pain assessment InfoViz tool will increase mutual understanding of pain severity, location, and quality between patients, interpreters, and providers, and consequently lead to increased satisfaction with communication, greater pain relief and reduced pain interference with daily life through better-informed diagnosis and treatment.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Sequential
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
13 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •age 18 and up
  • •Hmong patients that indicate they do not speak English well (LEP)
  • •self reported pain

排除标准

  • •indicate that they speak English well
  • •Interpreter Inclusion Criteria:
  • •13 years old or greater
  • •self-identify as interpreting for a Hmong individual in the health care setting
  • •Interpreter Exclusion Criteria:
  • •telephone interpreters as they are unable to view and use the InfoViz tool

研究组 & 干预措施

Usual Care Control

No Intervention

Standard of Care

InfoViz Intervention

Experimental

Pain information visualization (InfoViz) tool, Trained interpreters will use the InfoViz tool twice, before and during the clinical encounter

干预措施: InfoViz (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Percentage of Eligible Patients Enrolled

时间窗: up to 1 day

Feasibility with respect to recruitment will be measured by the percent of eligible patients who enroll.

Percentage of InfoViz Tools Completely Filled Out

时间窗: up to 1 day

Feasibility with respect to tool use will be measured as the proportion of InfoViz tools with pain severity marked, at least one pain location marked, and at least one pain quality marked on the InfoViz tool.

Proportion of Patients Who Complete the Study

时间窗: up to 4 weeks

Feasibility with respect to retention will be measured by the proportion of patients who complete the study.

Percentage of Items Correctly Performed on the Investigator Designed Fidelity Checklist

时间窗: up to 1 day

Feasibility will be in part measured by InfoViz tool fidelity. The percentage of items correctly performed by participants on the investigator-designed fidelity checklist will be reported.

Percentage of Congruency in Mutual Understanding: Patient to Interpreter

时间窗: up to 1 day

One question item from the 6-item Mutual Understanding Scale (MUS) asks participants about their main symptom (i.e., "What was the most important health complaint for which the physician was visited?") and providers to report participants' main symptom (e.g., "What was the most important health complaint for which the patient consulted with you?"). The percentage of congruency between the patient and interpreter response, from 0-100 where 100 is total congruency.

Percentage of Congruency in Mutual Understanding: Interpreter to Provider

时间窗: up to 1 day

One question item from the 6-item Mutual Understanding Scale (MUS) asks participants about their main symptom (i.e., "What was the most important health complaint for which the physician was visited?") and providers to report participants' main symptom (e.g., "What was the most important health complaint for which the patient consulted with you?"). The percentage of congruency between the interpreter and provider, from 0-100 where 100 is total congruency.

Percentage of Congruency in Mutual Understanding: Patient to Provider

时间窗: up to 1 day

One question item from the 6-item Mutual Understanding Scale (MUS) asks participants about their main symptom (i.e., "What was the most important health complaint for which the physician was visited?") and providers to report participants' main symptom (e.g., "What was the most important health complaint for which the patient consulted with you?"). The percentage of congruency between patient and provider, from 0-100 where 100 is total congruency.

次要结局

  • Participant Satisfaction With Communication Answer(up to 1 day)
  • Participant Pain Relief Measured Using a 5 Point Verbal Rating Scale(one time post 4-6 weeks after the clinic vist)
  • Participant Response to Pain Interference Question(usual care participants assessed at baseline and InfoViz participants assessed at 4 weeks)
  • Quality of Communication Answer(up to 1 day)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验