ISRCTN34712244已完成不适用
Blunt versus sharp expansion of the uterine incision at Caesarean delivery: a prospective randomised clinical trial
Farhat Hached University Teaching Hospital (Tunisia)0 个研究点目标入组 300 人开始时间: 2004年3月30日最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 300
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 性别
- Female
入选标准
- •All patients requiring elective or emergency, primary or repeat Caesarean section and planned to have low segment transverse uterine incision with:
- •1. Gestational age >34 weeks
- •2. No multiple gestation
- •3. No placenta praevia
排除标准
- •Not provided at time of registration
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
ongitudinal versus transverse extension of uterine incision during cesarean section: randomized controlled trialPACTR201711002795139Airforce specialized Hospital392
Unknown
2 期
Sharp Versus Blunt Uterine Incision ExpansionCesarean Section ComplicationsNCT03377894Kasr El Aini Hospital200
已完成
不适用
Randomized Comparison of Sharp Versus Blunt Techniques at CesareanDisruption of Uterine Incision After Cesarean SectionNCT01519440Istanbul Bakirkoy Maternity and Children Diseases Hospital1,076
进行中（未招募）
不适用
External Cephalic Version with uterine relaxation: atosiban versus fenoterol, a multi-centre trial - ECV: atosiban vs fenoterolECV of the fetus in breech position is a safe and relatively simple obstetrical intervention that reduces the incidence of caesarean section for breech position at term. Tocolysis can enhance the success rate of ECV with 40%. This trial will compare the effectiveness of atosiban with fenoterol during ECV in women with a singleton fetus in breech presentation at term.MedDRA version: 9.1Level: LLTClassification code 10006356Term: Breech presentationEUCTR2008-007344-34-NLAcademic Medical Centre
招募中
不适用
Investigation of uterine (cervical, endometrial) carcinogenesis by identifying multiple interaction [Host – HPV – Microbiome – Environment]KCT0002854CC Hospital1,800