跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05007704
NCT05007704已完成不适用

Competencies Required by Anesthesiologists Managing Critically Ill Medical and Surgical Patients in an Intensive Care Unit

Prashant Nasa1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,155 人开始时间: 2021年9月11日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
1,155
试验地点
1
主要终点
Development of Preliminary Competencies

研究概览

简要总结

Critical Care Medicine (CCM) has emerged as an independent specialty over the last few decades. Anesthesiologists being perioperative physicians, often practice CCM full time or part-time. Deficiencies have been noted by experts in the Anesthesiology training in certain competencies required for the management of critically ill medical and surgical patients in the Intensive care unit (ICU). This is often compounded by considerable variation in the training curriculum of the Anesthesiologists based on the geographical region and base specialty. The Intensive & Critical Care Medicine Committee of the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists (WFSA), has developed a preliminary survey of recently qualified Anesthesiologists, to review the existing competencies for CCM in the Anesthesiology curriculum across the globe. The results of this survey will be used to identify the gaps and additional competencies required for Anesthesiologists to practice Critical Care in ICU through expert consensus, using a Delphi process.

详细描述

BACKGROUND:

CCM has emerged as an independent specialty over the last few decades. Anesthesiologists being perioperative physicians are an integral part of this progress, with many of them opting for CCM as a full-time career. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought unprecedented challenges to the health care system. Anesthesiologists working in the operating room (OR) and those working in the ICU have been the frontline workers along with other Critical Care professionals in the management of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Though a few countries have recognized CCM as a separate specialty of medicine, in most countries, it is considered as a sub-specialty of broad specialties like Anesthesiology, Pulmonary Medicine or Internal Medicine. Some professional bodies have developed a formal curriculum for training in CCM. The Competency-Based Training programme in Intensive Care Medicine (CoBaTrICE) from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) is a widely accepted formal structured training curriculum in CCM. Most curricula are designed only for high-income, well-resourced training and practice environments and do not account for additional skills and competencies that may be required to practice in resource variable settings, something the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated needs to be universal. The transition of Anesthesiologists working in OR or managing critically ill surgical/ polytrauma patients into working in ICU has largely been smooth. Nevertheless, experts have noted deficiencies in the Anesthesiology training in certain competencies required for the management of critically ill medical and surgical patients in the ICU. This is often compounded by considerable variation in the training curriculum of the Anesthesiologists based on the geographical region and type of institution. There is a need to identify these competencies so that Anesthesiologists who wish to practice full time or part-time Critical Care can acquire these competencies to improve their ability to manage critically ill patients in ICU in different World Health Organization defined healthcare facilities levels. This may also help provide guidance to educators worldwide regarding the competencies to be included in Anesthesiology training that may help Anesthesiologists work better with critically ill patients in ICU. These competencies have never been formally identified or published. The investigators plan to review the existing competencies for CCM in the Anesthesiology curriculum across the globe through a preliminary survey. Thereafter, the investigators plan to identify the additional competencies required through consensus among Experts, using a Delphi method. These additional competencies, classified as mandatory, desirable, and optional, may serve as a guide for Anesthesiologists to practice Critical Care in ICU in different levels of health care facilities worldwide.

OBJECTIVES

  1. The investigators aim to review/identify the existing competencies for CCM in the Anesthesiology curriculum across the globe.
  2. The investigators aim to generate expert consensus on the additional competencies (mandatory desirable and optional) required for Anesthesiologists to practice Critical Care in the ICU.
  3. Provide guidance to educators worldwide regarding the competencies to be included in the Anesthesiology curriculum that may help Anesthesiologists work better with critically ill patients in ICU.

METHODOLOGY

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Cross Sectional

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Preliminary survey
  • Anesthesiologists who have completed their training within the last three years.
  • Selection of experts for the Delphi process:
  • Anesthesiologist (a medical graduate who has completed a nationally recognized Anesthesiology training programme)
  • Involved in the management of critically ill patients in ICU
  • More than ten years of experience in teaching and training in Critical Care.

排除标准

  • Preliminary survey
  • Anesthesiologists have started training in critical care medicine immediately after completion of their Anesthesia training
  • Anesthesiologists who refused to participate
  • Delphi Process selection of experts:
  • Non-Anesthesiologist intensivist
  • Anesthesiologist not involved in the management of critically ill patient
  • Pediatric Intensivist

结局指标

主要结局

Development of Preliminary Competencies

时间窗: 30 days

Using a 5-point likert scale (never seen, have observed, can manage under supervision, can manage with minimal assistance, and can manage independently) through a cross-sectional survey with 500 recently (less than three years) trained Anesthesiologists.

Consensus among participating experts

时间窗: 45 days

The participating experts will be asked to score each of the competencies listed on a 5-point Likert scale (nonessential, optional, optional but desirable, desirable, and mandatory).The Delphi rounds will be continued till desired consensus and stability is achieved for competencies.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Prashant Nasa
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Prashant Nasa

Head Critical Care Medicine

NMC Specialty Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Competencies Required by Anesthesiologists Managing... | 临床试验