跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07504705
NCT07504705招募中不适用

Comparison of Intertransverse Process and Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Acute Postoperative Analgesia Management for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Konya City Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 110 人开始时间: 2026年5月7日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
110
试验地点
1
主要终点
NRS Score

研究概览

简要总结

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the gold standard for the surgical treatment of benign gallbladder diseases; however, despite its minimally invasive nature, a significant proportion of patients experience substantial early postoperative pain, which impacts patient comfort and the duration of hospital stay. The current PROSPECT review and previous studies emphasize that this pain is multifactorial-comprising somatic, visceral, and phrenic nerve-mediated shoulder-tip components-and therefore advocate for an opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic approach. Within this framework, first-line recommendations include paracetamol, NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors, dexamethasone, and local anesthetic infiltration of the surgical site and/or intraperitoneal cavity, alongside appropriate regional blocks; opioids should be reserved solely for rescue analgesia.

Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia blocks are increasingly utilized for acute visceral pain conditions, such as renal colic. The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is an interfacial block performed in the thoracic paraspinal region, and it is hypothesized that its extensive spread may influence somatic and, to some extent, visceral pain pathways. Nevertheless, anatomical and clinical studies report inconsistent effects of ESPB on visceral pain, noting that local anesthetics may not consistently reach the paravertebral space, thereby leading to variable block efficacy.

Consequently, the Intertransverse Process Block (ITPB), which targets a plane anatomically closer to the paravertebral space, has been described in recent years as an alternative technique. ITPB is performed by injecting local anesthetic into the interfacial space adjacent to the retro-superior costotransverse ligament; it is reported to carry a low risk of complications as it does not require direct orientation toward the pleura or neuraxial structures. Clinical trials indicate that ITPB provides analgesic efficacy comparable to paravertebral blocks in both thoracic and abdominal surgeries and reduces opioid consumption. Furthermore, anatomical studies suggest that the probability of local anesthetic spread into the paravertebral space is higher with ITPB than with ESPB.

However, a randomized controlled trial comparing ESPB and ITPB in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy is currently lacking in the literature. Therefore, the present study was designed to address this gap.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Eligible patients will be allocated into two groups-the ITPB group and the ESPB group-in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated algorithm with variable block sizes (4-8). The randomly generated codes will be maintained by non-study personnel and will remain inaccessible to the investigators. The randomization sequence will be placed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes by a staff member not involved in the study. Through this methodology, triple-blinding will be ensured: the patient, the outcome assessor, and the data analyst will remain blinded to the group allocation.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 35 kg/m²
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score of I-III
  • Ability to provide written and verbal informed consent

排除标准

  • Coagulopathy or use of anticoagulant medications
  • Infection at the injection site
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Chronic opioid use or analgesic dependence
  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease or psychiatric disorders
  • Previous regional block performed within the last 24 hours
  • Patients requiring emergency surgery
  • Cases converted from laparoscopic surgery to open surgery

研究组 & 干预措施

Erector Spinae Plane Block

Active Comparator

干预措施: Erector Spinae Plane Block (Procedure)

Intertransverse Process Block

Active Comparator

干预措施: Intertransverse Process Block (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

NRS Score

时间窗: 0 to 24 hours postoperatively

The primary objective of this study is to compare the effects of ESPB and ITPB techniques on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. You hypothesis is that NRS scores will be lower in patients receiving ITPB compared to the ESPB group, as the ITPB is expected to provide more extensive visceral analgesia. Pain Assessment: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain intensity will be reported using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Scale Range: Scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 10. Interpretation: A score of 0 represents "no pain," while a score of 10 represents the "worst possible pain." Consequently, higher scores indicate a worse outcome (increased pain severity), while lower scores indicate superior analgesic efficacy.

次要结局

  • Opioid consumption(0 to 24 hours postoperatively)

研究者

发起方
Konya City Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ömer Keklicek

principal investigator

Konya City Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验