跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04642300
NCT04642300已完成不适用

Effect of Holmich Protocol and Myofascial Release Technique on Groin Pain in Tennis Players

Riphah International University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 22 人开始时间: 2020年3月4日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
22
试验地点
1
主要终点
Hip Range of motion

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of Homlich Protocol and Myofacial release technique on groin pain in tennis players. A total of 14 players will be included in the clinical trail. There will be one group of 7 players in which Holmich protocol will be applied while in the other group of 7 players will be given Myofascial Release Technique which includes Transverse friction massage and Stretching. Data will be collected by outcome measures before and after the exercise protocol is given. Treatment will be administered three times a week (on even or odd days). The duration of Holmich Protocol each session is about 90 min for module 1 (first two weeks) and 120 min for module 2 (from the third week). From the third week, the athletes will be asked to perform exercises from module 1 every other day, between the treatment sessions. While passive treatment will be given for 30 mins per session. During the treatment course and before the final evaluation, no athletic activity will be permitted . Injuries data will be collected prospectively by respective coaches. Coaches will be trained for identification and classification of injuries.

详细描述

Groin pain arising from sports injuries is widespread, especially among those who participate in sports that involve repetitive rotational movements such as kicking and turning as in soccer. This type of injury is the fourth most common sports injury, with soccer players suffering from long-term symptoms and frequent relapses. The injury rate is 1.015-1.133 per 1000 hours of play, which is equivalent to 11%-16% of all sports injuries. The prognosis for exercise- related groin pain is not clear. Injured athletes may be forced to wait a long time before returning to sports activity free of restriction.

It is known that adductor-related groin injuries are the most common cause of groin injury, accounting for 69% of groin injuries in football and 58% across all forms of sport. As limited range of hip abduction and hip internal rotation and decreased hip adductor strength (absolute and comparative to the hip abductors) are considered potential risk factors for groin injury. Adductor-related groin pain is often treated without surgery. Among different conservative approaches, it appears that exercise therapy (ET) is more effective than other conservative treatment methods such as electrotherapy, manual therapy or steroid injections. Unfortunately, however, many important factors including frequency, duration and the exact amount of resistance or perceived exertion to be used in the ET protocols have not been carefully recorded in clinical trials. To our best knowledge, the randomised clinical trial carried out by Holmich et al in 1999 still offers the best evidence for the effectiveness of exercise as a prescription for the treatment of adductor-related groin pain. Holmich et al collated the results of ET (based on isometric and isotonic strengthening of the hip abductor/adductor and the abdominal muscles) with results from physiotherapy. They evaluated successful treatment (based on pain measures), patients' subjective global assessments and their return to sport without groin pain at the same level as before the injury. 'Successful treatment' as described in their study is an unfeasible and non-validated measure for evaluating outcome; on the other hand, the published results by Holmich et al was not compared with any such other treatment.

Yousefzadeh A et al conducted a study which checked the effect of Holmich Protocol on groin pain and its results showed to be an effective treatment.

Weir A et al performed multi modal treatment(MMT) in comparison to exercise therapy(ET), results showed MMT to be more effective then ET.

Sernar A et al did a systemic review on treatment of groin players which showed low quality studies present for groin injury management.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 35 Years(Adult)
性别
Male
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Male Gender
  • •Age: 18 - 35 years
  • •Groin pain for at least 2 months
  • •3 - 7 pain score on NPRS
  • •Playing Sports for atleast 1 year

排除标准

  • •Femoral or inguinal hernia
  • •Chronic urinary tract disorder or prostatitis
  • •Disease, fracture of the pelvis or the lower limbs inhibiting the participant from the completing the treatment plan
  • •Entrapment of the genitofemoral or back pain felt between T10 and L5 levels and consisting of the facet joints
  • •Virulent Ilioinguinal nerve
  • •Inability to follow the active physical training plan
  • •Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during the study
  • •Participation in principled strength training of the hip adductors for more than once a week in the 6 months prior to the study.

研究组 & 干预措施

Holmich Protocol

Active Comparator

Treatment will be administered three times a week (on even or odd days). The duration of each session was about 90 min for module 1 (first two weeks) and 120 min for module 2 (from the third week). From the third week, the athletes were asked to perform exercises from module 1 every other day, between the treatment sessions

干预措施: Holmich Protocol (Procedure)

Myofascial Release Technique

Active Comparator

Treatment wiil be given twice a week as individual treatment by the physiotherapist. The duration of treatment is about 30 min.

干预措施: Myofascial Release Technique (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Hip Range of motion

时间窗: 8 Weeks

The hip range of motion including abduction, adduction, external and internal rotation in 90°of flexion will be measured by an adjustable goniometer.

T-Agility TEST

时间窗: 8 Weeks

Set out four cones 5 yards = 4.57 m, 10 yards = 9.14 m. The subject starts at cone A. On the command of the timer, the subject sprints to cone B and touches the base of the cone with their right hand. They then turn left and shuffle sideways to cone C, and also touches its base, this time with their left hand. Then shuffling sideways to the right to cone D and touching the base with the right hand. They then shuffle back to cone B touching with the left hand, and run backwards to cone A. The stopwatch is stopped as they pass cone A

Edgren Side Test (ESST)

时间窗: 8 Weeks

Five cones or lines are placed in a line, three feet apart (12 feet total between the two outside cones). The starting position is at the centre cone, facing forward with feet straddling the center line. At the command 'go', the participant sidesteps to the right until their right foot touches or crosses the outside cone or tape mark. The participant then sidesteps to the left until their left foot touches or crosses the left outside cone or tape mark. The participant sidesteps back and forth to the outside cones as rapidly as possible for 10 seconds.

Triple Hop Test (THT)

时间窗: 8 Weeks

In the triple hop test, the aim is to jump as far as possible on a single leg three consecutive times, without losing balance and landing firmly. The distance is measured from the start line to the heel of the landing leg. The goal is to have a less than 10% difference in hop distance between the injured limb and uninjured limb.

Visual Analogue Scale Pain Score (VAS)

时间窗: 8 Weeks

The visual analog scale (VAS) scores are based on self-reported measures of symptoms that are recorded with a single handwritten mark placed at one point along the length of a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between the two ends of the scale-"no pain" on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the "worst pain" on the right end of the scale (10 cm). The values can be used to track pain progression for a patient or to compare pain between patients with similar conditions.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验