Comparing Self-guided Learning (Video and hands-on Simulation) With Traditional Instructor-led Learning for Medical Device Training: a Randomized-controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 224
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Application skills achieved in the context of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) test station per participant (yes or no)
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of this study project is to clarify whether defined practical application skills are learned by anesthesiology specialists through a self-directed learning program with learning videos and a hands-on exercise station ("intervention group"). "Control group" is a traditional instructor-led practical workshop classroom teaching.
Hypothesis: A video-based and self-directed learning program shows no difference in the learning successes than traditional face-to-face workshops.
详细描述
The Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine is going to buy and introduce a new generation of anaesthetic machines. Therefore the whole clinical staff of the department who will operate the new anaesthetic machine in the future must be educated and trained with this device before working with patients.
Continuous professional training in the use of medical devices is an essential part of developing professional skills, including in anaesthesia. The professional, routine use of devices is essential to guarantee patient safety. The usual instructor-led workshop-based equipment training in face-to-face lessons is time-consuming and resource-intensive. The high work intensity and shift work in anaesthesia pose a challenge for such training courses. Video-supported learning sequences were more effective than traditional face-to-face lessons, especially for procedural - cognitive processes of complex psychomotor skills. Self-controlled practical practice is more effective than externally controlled practice conditions.
The aim of this study is to clarify whether defined practical application skills (anaesthetic machine) are learned by anesthesiology specialists (nurses and physicians of the department) through a self-directed learning program with learning videos and a hands-on exercise station ("intervention group"). "Control group" is a traditional instructor-led practical workshop classroom teaching.
• The null hypothesis (H0) is that a video-based and self-directed learning program shows no difference in the learning success than traditional face-to-face workshops
The aim of this study is to clarify whether anesthesiologists and nurses anaesthetists can learn defined practical application skills through a self-directed learning program with learning videos and a hands-on training station. If this educational research project is able to demonstrate that self-guided learning of complex psychomotor skills needed for the handling of medical devices like respirators is non-inferior to traditional classroom teaching of such skills, this might minimize the dependence on traditional educator-driven resource-intensive workshop teaching and has the potential to change clinical teaching in the future. The educational topic of the study is "device training in the hospital sector".
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- Single (Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Clinical working anaesthesia staff of the Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Bern University Hospital
- •written consent
排除标准
- •- not fulfilling inclusion criteria
研究组 & 干预措施
self-guided learning (video and hands-on simulation)
video-based self-directed learning
干预措施: self-guided learning (Other)
traditional instructor-led learning
traditional instructor-led learning in face-to-face workshop
结局指标
主要结局
Application skills achieved in the context of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) test station per participant (yes or no)
时间窗: 10 minutes
Achieved or not achieved based on defined practical assignments and oral questioning using a defined catalogue of questions. The testing is carried out by an expert trained as a key user. The test is rated as successful if 60% or more of the questions are answered successfully. The following four criteria are checked: * Working principle * Security aspect * Handling and operation * Theory-practice transfer Each criterion is assessed with 0-3 points 0 = does not apply 1. = rather does not apply 2. = applies 3. = applies very well The final evaluation of the device test is based on the following granulated scale: A - 100% of the criteria (excellent) B 90% - 99% (very good) C 80% - 89% (good) D 70% - 79% (satisfactory) E 60% - 69% (sufficient) F \<60% (unsatisfactory)
次要结局
- level of application skills(10 minutes)
- Time spent(1 day)
- cost comparison(1 day)
- open questions after the training(1 day)
- use of resources(1 day)
