跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02941471
NCT02941471已完成1 期

A Double-blind Pilot Randomised Trial of Transabdominal Interferential Stimulation and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Severe Chronic Constipation in Adults Unresponsive to Conservative Treatments

St Mark's Hospital Foundation0 个研究点目标入组 14 人开始时间: 2015年1月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
1 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
14
主要终点
Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire (PAC-QOL)

研究概览

简要总结

Several transabdominal electrical stimulation studies have been reported for constipation in childhood. This study aims to assess the efficacy of this technique in adults with chronic constipation and compare two different electrical therapies.

详细描述

Patients with Rome III defined constipation unresponsive to medical and behavioural treatment will be randomised in a double-blind prospective trial to receive either four weeks of transabdominal electrical stimulation (TENS) or Interferential stimulation (IFC). Treatment will be self-administered at home for sixty minutes a day. The response to treatment will be assessed with the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire (PAC-QOL), the Patient-Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) tool and a bowel visual analogue scale (VAS). A bowel diary will be kept a week before and during the final week of stimulation, recording daily bowel frequency.

IFC stimulation is an effective, cheap and low risk intervention which has demonstrated efficacy for dysphagia, urinary incontinence, overactive bladder syndromes and chronic pain. The precise mechanism of its analgesic and pro-kinetic effect is unknown. The intervention is delivered by two separate continuous alternating electrical currents. Two pairs of pad electrodes are arranged in a quadripolar manner where each pair delivers a different frequency of current. It is suggested that this arrangement of stimulation improves colonic propagation. However as direct massage of the abdomen has demonstrated benefit in constipation it is argued that IFC is not a specific requirement and that non-IFC electrical stimulation over the abdomen is sufficient to evoke the same colonic and clinical responses. Owing to these questions the efficacy of this intervention will be further evaluated in adults.

This study has two aims. The primary aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of transabdominal electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in adult patients with chronic constipation. The secondary aim is to establish whether IFC was superior to non-IFC (TENS) electrical stimulation in adults with chronic constipation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age over 18 years
  • Rome III defined constipation (frequency of defecation of less than three times a week, straining or sense of incomplete emptying associated with at least 25% of defecations. Lumpy, hard stools or anal digitation for at least 25% of defecations
  • Failed Biofeedback
  • Competent and willing to complete stimulation at home
  • Competent and willing to complete the questionnaires and bowel diaries

排除标准

  • Rectal prolapse
  • Active inflammatory bowel disease
  • Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during trial
  • Spinal cord injuries/cauda equina syndrome
  • Other implanted electrical devices
  • Allergy to device components
  • Neurological disorders

结局指标

主要结局

Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire (PAC-QOL)

时间窗: After 4 weeks of stimulation

A validated tool for constipation severity assessment

次要结局

  • A bowel visual analogue scale(After 4 weeks of stimulation)
  • Patient-Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM)(After 4 weeks of stimulation)
  • Weekly bowel and laxative diary(one week and 4 weeks of stimulation)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Fareed Iqbal

Clinical Research Fellow/PI

St Mark's Hospital Foundation

相似试验