跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07261995
NCT07261995招募中不适用

Comparison of Outcomes of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Management of Renal Calculi Measuring 1 to 2 Centimeters

Ziauddin Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 98 人开始时间: 2025年9月5日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
98
试验地点
1
主要终点
Stone clearance rate

研究概览

简要总结

This study is being carried out in patients with kidney stones measuring between 1 and 2 centimeters. Kidney stones are common in Pakistan and can cause severe pain, infection, and repeated hospital visits. Two commonly used treatments for stones of this size are extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). ESWL uses shock waves applied from outside the body to break the stone into small fragments that can pass in the urine. RIRS is a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure in which a thin flexible scope is passed through the urinary passage into the kidney and a laser is used to break the stone.

Adult patients aged 18 to 65 years with a single kidney stone of 1-2 cm will be included. According to the urologist's clinical judgment and patient preference, individuals will undergo either ESWL (Group A) as a day-care shock wave procedure or RIRS (Group B) under general anesthesia using a laser. All patients will receive standard care before and after the procedure and will be followed for 28 days.

The study will compare how completely the stone is cleared (based on a CT scan), how long patients stay in hospital, how much pain they feel after the procedure, and whether they develop visible blood in the urine or signs of infection such as fever and raised white cell count. The need for any further procedure for the same stone will also be recorded. The central hypothesis is that there is a meaningful difference between ESWL and RIRS in stone clearance, safety, pain, and need for retreatment. The findings are expected to help doctors and patients choose the most suitable treatment for kidney stones of this size in routine practice.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients aged between 18 and 65 years.
  • Patients diagnosed with a single renal calculus measuring between 1 cm and 2 cm, confirmed on imaging (ultrasound or non-contrast CT KUB).

排除标准

  • Presence of multiple renal stones or bilateral renal stones.
  • Patients with anatomical abnormalities such as horseshoe kidney, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, or calyceal diverticulum based on medical history or radiological findings.
  • Active urinary tract infection at the time of intervention.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Patients with bleeding disorders or on anticoagulation therapy that cannot be safely stopped.
  • Patients with chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²).
  • Patients with morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m²).
  • Patients with solitary kidney.

结局指标

主要结局

Stone clearance rate

时间窗: 28 days after the procedure

Proportion of participants in each treatment group who achieve successful stone clearance, defined as absence of visible stone or presence of a clinically insignificant residual fragment measuring ≤4 mm on non-contrast computed tomography of kidneys, ureters and bladder (CT-KUB). All scans will be interpreted and reported by a consultant radiologist blinded to treatment allocation. Stone clearance will be analysed as a binary variable (cleared/not cleared) for comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery.

次要结局

  • Postoperative pain intensity (VAS score)(At 24 hours after the procedure)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Muhammad Waqas Arshad

Principal Investigator

Ziauddin Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy... | 临床试验