跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06870435
NCT06870435招募中不适用

Comparison and Strategy Optimization of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) DNA and BNLF2b Total Antibodies (P85-Ab) with VCA-IgA and EBNA1-IgA for Screening Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in High-risk Areas

Ming-Yuan Chen1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 68,649 人开始时间: 2025年1月24日最近更新:
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
68,649
试验地点
1
主要终点
Sensitivity and specificity of EBV DNA testing, P85-Ab testing and the two-antibody method testing

研究概览

简要总结

This study is a prospective, self-controlled, multicenter clinical trial. All participants will be tested for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated biomarkers, including the two-antibody method (VCA-IgA and EBNA1-IgA), BNLF2b total antibodies (P85-Ab), and plasma EBV DNA. Furthermore, novel screening biomarkers, such as next-generation sequencing for EBV and castoff cells using nasopharyngeal swabs, will be explored.

First, it aims to investigate whether plasma EBV DNA testing or the P85-Ab testing can achieve higher sensitivity than the current standard two-antibody method testing while maintaining specificity in NPC screening, thereby identifying the optimal initial NPC screening strategy. Based on the determined optimal initial screening strategy, the study will validate the proposed two-step method (subjects first undergo two-antibody method testing and P85-Ab testing; those positive for either one biomarker above proceed to plasma EBV DNA testing; subjects positive in both steps are defined as high-risk and receive endoscopic examinations with or without biopsy) compared with the single-step method (subjects simultaneously undergo two-antibody method testing, P85-Ab testing, and plasma EBV DNA testing; subjects with any positive biomarker undergo endoscopic examinations with or without biopsy) and each single screening testing. The aim is to determine whether two-step method can further improve the positive predictive value (PPV) while maintaining non-inferior sensitivity, thereby enhancing screening efficiency, reducing the rate of invasive procedures (such as endoscopic biopsies), and lowering medical costs and insurance burdens.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Screening
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
30 Years 至 69 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Voluntarily signed informed consent.
  • Age between 30 and 69 years at the time of screening.
  • Residents of Guangdong Province or Guangxi Province.
  • Able to cooperate with long-term follow-up.

排除标准

  • Severe medical comorbidities, significant organ (heart, lung, liver, kidney) dysfunction, or psychiatric disorders.
  • Severe autoimmune diseases or immunodeficiency.
  • History of or current malignant tumors.
  • Inability to cooperate with the study due to psychological, social, familial, or geographical reasons.

研究组 & 干预措施

Screening cohort

Experimental

Participants aged between 30 and 69 years old.

干预措施: Blood, nasopharyngeal swab and saliva (Biological)

Screening cohort

Experimental

Participants aged between 30 and 69 years old.

干预措施: EBNA1-IgA, VCA-IgA, P85-Ab and EBV DNA (Diagnostic Test)

Screening cohort

Experimental

Participants aged between 30 and 69 years old.

干预措施: Novel screening biomarkers (Diagnostic Test)

Screening cohort

Experimental

Participants aged between 30 and 69 years old.

干预措施: Endoscopic examinations with or without biopsy (Diagnostic Test)

结局指标

主要结局

Sensitivity and specificity of EBV DNA testing, P85-Ab testing and the two-antibody method testing

时间窗: At screening, 3 years and 10 years thereafter.

To investigate whether plasma EBV DNA testing or the P85-Ab testing can achieve higher sensitivity than the current standard two-antibody method testing while maintaining specificity in NPC screening. Sensitivity refers to the proportion of actual positive cases (true positives) correctly identified by a test.

Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the two-step method, single-step method and each single screening testing.

时间窗: At screening, 3 years and 10 years thereafter.

To determine whether two-step method can further improve the positive predictive value (PPV) while maintaining non-inferior sensitivity. PPV refers to the proportion of positive test results that are true positives. Sensitivity refers to the proportion of actual positive cases (true positives) correctly identified by a test.

次要结局

  • Negative predictive value (NPV)(At screening, 3 years and 10 years thereafter.)
  • Early diagnosis rate of nasopharyngeal carcinoma(At screening, 3 years and 10 years thereafter.)
  • Number needed to screen (NNS)(At screening, 3 years and 10 years thereafter.)
  • Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Death Rates(At screening, 3 years and 10 years thereafter.)
  • Death Rates From All Causes(At screening, 3 years and 10 years thereafter.)

研究者

发起方
Ming-Yuan Chen
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Ming-Yuan Chen

Professior, Chief physician

Sun Yat-sen University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验