跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03655626
NCT03655626已完成不适用

Implementation and Evaluations of Previously Developed Novel Early Warning System to Detect and Treat Sepsis

Duke University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 32,003 人开始时间: 2018年11月5日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
32,003
试验地点
2
主要终点
Rate of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) bundle completion for patients with sepsis

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to study the implementation and impact of an early warning system to detect and treat sepsis in the emergency room. We are observing the implementation of a Sepsis Machine Learning Model on all Adult patients. All data (observations field notes, interview recording & transcripts, and survey responses) will be stored on HIPAA-compliant Duke servers behind the Duke firewall, and requiring password-protected user authentication to access. The risk to patients is minimal. The two risks to interviewed clinical staff we have identified involve loss of work time and anonymity.

详细描述

Sepsis represents a significant burden to the healthcare system. National predictions estimate 751,000 cases of severe sepsis per annum which will increase at a rate of 1.5%. Sepsis accounts for >$23 billion in aggregate hospital costs across all payers and represents nearly 4% of all hospital stays. Six percent of all deaths in the US can be attributed to sepsis. Protocol driven care bundles improve clinical outcomes but require early and accurate detection of sepsis. Unfortunately, identifying sepsis early remains elusive even for experienced clinicians leading to diagnostic uncertainty.

To improve diagnostic consensus, a task force in 2016 agreed upon a new sepsis definition. The task force also included a new risk stratification tool to improve early identification, the quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) model, which was more accurate than the older Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) in predicting adverse clinical outcomes. However, due to the reliance of end organ dysfunction, the new definition has been criticized for its detection of sepsis late in the clinical course. Clinical decision support tools based on predictive analytics can provide actionable information and improve diagnostic accuracy particularly in sepsis.

Several early warning tools have been described in the published literature based upon predictive analytics and large datasets. One example is the National Early Warning Score (NEWS), which was developed to discriminate patients at risk of cardiac arrest, unplanned intensive care admission, or death. Scores such as NEWS are typically broad in scope and not designed to specifically target sepsis. They are also conceptually simple, as they use only a small number of variables and compare them to normal ranges to generate a composite score. In assigning independent scores to each variable and using only the most recent value, they both ignore complex relationships between the variables and their evolution in time.

In previous work, our group developed a framework to model multivariate time series using multitask Gaussian processes, accounting for the high uncertainty, frequent missing values, and irregular sampling rates typically associated with real clinical data can be read in our prior work. Our machine learning approach is superior to other sepsis detection models that use traditional analytics and machine learning techniques. A custom web application, Sepsis Watch, presents the risk score along with relevant patient information and prompts the user to further evaluate the patient and begin treatment, if appropriate. The Sepsis Watch system is now being implemented by clinical operations at Duke University Hospital.

Our study employs a sequential roll-out study design in the Emergency Department at Duke University Hospital. Our study will involve pods A, B, C, and the Resuscitation Bay. The operational project is not being implemented on the psychiatry wing, fast track, triage or any inpatient encounters. The operational project and thus our study period is based upon a two-phase roll out:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Arrival to Duke University Hospital emergency department pods A, B, and C, or resuscitation bay

排除标准

  • Under 18 years old at time of emergency department arrival

结局指标

主要结局

Rate of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) bundle completion for patients with sepsis

时间窗: Within 96 hours of emergency department arrival

Proportion of patients with sepsis that complete Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services treatment bundle

次要结局

  • Mean Hospital length of stay for patients with sepsis(Within 30 days of emergency department arrival)
  • Mean time from sepsis onset to IV fluids(Within 96 hours of emergency department arrival)
  • Mean time from sepsis onset to CMS bundle completion(Within 96 hours of emergency department arrival)
  • Mean time from ED arrival to sepsis for patients with sepsis(Within 96 hours of emergency department arrival)
  • Rate of lactate complete for patients with sepsis(Within 96 hours of emergency department arrival)
  • Number of sepsis diagnosis codes across Duke University Hospital patients per month(Within 30 days of emergency department arrival)
  • Mean Inpatient mortality for patients with sepsis(Within 30 days of emergency department arrival)
  • Average number of patients who develop sepsis per day and month(Within 96 hours of emergency department arrival)
  • Average number of patients who develop sepsis and are not treated per day and month(Within 96 hours of emergency department arrival)
  • Mean ED length of stay for patients with sepsis(Within 96 hours of emergency department arrival)
  • Mean ICU requirement rate for patients with sepsis(Within 30 days of emergency department arrival)
  • Mean time from sepsis onset to blood culture(Within 96 hours of emergency department arrival)
  • Mean time from sepsis onset to antibiotics(Within 96 hours of emergency department arrival)
  • Mean time from sepsis onset to lactate(Within 96 hours of emergency department arrival)

研究者

发起方
Duke University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验