跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00370903
NCT00370903已完成不适用

Retrospective Study of Relationship of Postpartum Depression to Planned Versus Emergent Cesarean Section

Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2006年8月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
200
试验地点
1

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this retrospective study is to determine if there is an increase in postpartum depression (PPD) among women who undergo an emergency cesarean section as opposed to a planned cesarean section. We will analyze the hospital and clinic medical records of postpartum women who delivered by cesarean section (CS) at Tulsa Regional Medical Center between January 1, 2003, and June 1, 2005, and who obtained their postpartum care at the OSU Ob/Gyn Clinic in Tulsa, Oklahoma. We will record whether the cesarean was planned or emergent, and we will note the score they received on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale when they came to the clinic for their four-week postpartum visit. A score of 12 or lower on the EPDS will be considered "not depressed", and a score of 13 or higher will be considered "depressed." Numbers of depressed patients will be compared among the two types of cesarean sections and analyzed for statistical differences using the chi-squared method of analysis.

详细描述

The purpose of this retrospective study is to determine if there is an increase in postpartum depression (PPD) among women who undergo an emergency cesarean section as opposed to a planned cesarean section. All previous research documenting the rate of PPD in cesarean section patients looks only at the incidence of PPD in cesarean section versus vaginal delivery, and does not separate emergent versus planned cesarean section. The general study hypothesis is as follows: An emergent cesarean section can be an emotionally traumatic experience. Women who have a cesarean section for emergent causes are not psychologically prepared for surgery, and thus experience an increased rate of PPD. The null hypothesis is: There is no significant difference in the rate of PPD among women who have a cesarean section for emergent causes versus women who have their cesarean section at the previously scheduled time.

Postpartum depression (PPD) is diagnosed in approximately 10-20% of women (DSM-IV-TR), and 25% of these women still suffer from PPD twelve months after delivery (Gregoire et al, 1996). Risks for developing PPD include a higher subjective burden of childbirth, poor relationship with spouse, significant other, or father of the baby, unemployment or dissatisfaction with job, and low socioeconomic status.

Obstetrical history risk factors include previous abortions, high-risk pregnancy, low birth weight, and cesarean section (Bergant et al, 1998).

Delivery via cesarean section (CS) creates a much different emotional experience than does a vaginal delivery. Disappointment in the ability to have a natural birth, feelings of resentment towards the physician, altered treatment expectation, as well as, pain and trauma associated with surgery are all contributing factors (Al-Nuaim, 2004). A majority of women consider an emergency cesarean section (CS) to be a mentally traumatic encounter. One third of women who require an emergency CS will experience posttraumatic stress reactions during the postpartum period (Ryding et al, 1997). Fisher et al reported that there is a significant relationship between mode of delivery and negative psychological outcomes. A mother who has a CS instead of a vaginal delivery is more likely to have mood deterioration, lowered self-esteem, grief reaction, posttraumatic distress, and depression (Fisher et al, 1997).

We propose to analyze the hospital and clinic medical records of 200 postpartum women who delivered by cesarean section (CS) at Tulsa Regional Medical Center between January 1, 2003, and June 1, 2005, and who obtained their postpartum care at the OSU Ob/Gyn Clinic in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Of the charts reviewed, 100 women will have had a CS for emergent causes, and the other 100 will have delivered via a planned CS.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
15 Years 至 43 Years(Child, Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Included are postpartum women ages 15 to 43 who have given birth via cesarean section at Tulsa Regional Medical Center between January 1, 2003 and June 1,
  • Postpartum follow up visit(s) must have occurred at the OSU Ob/Gyn Clinic in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

排除标准

  • Patients who deliver vaginally, have an intrauterine fetal demise, known anomalies in the delivered fetus, a known mood disorder during pregnancy, or drug use during pregnancy or the postpartum course will be excluded.

研究者

发起方
Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences
申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验