跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00297752
NCT00297752已完成4 期

A Randomised Multicentre Clinical Trial on the Efficacy of Flammacerium in the Treatment of Facial Burns and the Impact of Facial Burns on Psychosocial Wellbeing

Association of Dutch Burn Centres3 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 154 人开始时间: 2006年3月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
154
试验地点
3
主要终点
Regarding the efficacy of treatment

研究概览

简要总结

The face is involved in 40-50% of patients with burns admitted to the Dutch Burn Centres. Scarring of the face as a consequence of burns will often have a detrimental effect on function and aesthetics, and may cause negative effects on psychosocial wellbeing. What the best treatment is for facial burns, minimising scarring, is unclear. Besides that, there is little empirical evidence regarding the impact of facial scarring on psychosocial wellbeing.

In clinical practice good results are felt to be achieved by treatment of facial burns with flammacerium. To substantiate the perceived advantages of flammacerium, its efficacy is compared to flammazine, a current alternative of care. The efficacy of treatment will be assessed in a prospective randomised multicentre clinical trial. Efficacy will be analysed in terms of number of patients requiring surgery and functional and aesthetic outcome.

Apart from medical outcome, this study offers the opportunity to study psychosocial problems associated with facial defects. It is still an unresolved question whether facial scarring causes more or different psychosocial problems. Therefore, self-esteem and quality of life will be examined over time, in relation to depression, posttraumatic stress symptoms and other factors, such as coping style and social support.

By evaluating the efficacy of different treatment strategies, we aim to optimise the standard of care of facial burns. Furthermore, this study wants to shed more light on the psychosocial impact of facial injury. With these results psychosocial professionals will be able to focus on persons at risk and to be better able to meet a patient's personal needs.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • patients of 18 years of age or older, competent or temporarily incompetent, who are admitted to one of the three dedicated Dutch Burn Centres with burn injuries involving the face

排除标准

  • patients not seen within 24 hours postburn
  • patients with mental or cognitive deficits that may interfere with providing informed consent
  • patients with poor Dutch proficiency
  • patients with chemical burns

研究组 & 干预措施

'ceriumnitrate silversulfadiazine (flammacerium)

Active Comparator

facial burns treatment with Cerium nitrate silver sulfadiazine

干预措施: ceriumnitrate silversulfadiazine (flammacerium) (Drug)

flammazine

Active Comparator

facial burns treatment with silver sulfadiazine

干预措施: silversulfadiazine (flammazine) (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Regarding the efficacy of treatment

时间窗: 3 weeks

time to wound healing

* number of patients requiring surgical excision of their facial burns

时间窗: 6 weeks

number of patients requiring surgical treatment for healing of facial burns

Regarding psychosocial impact:

时间窗: 3 months

discrepancy between patient and observer scar assessment

* quality of life and self esteem

时间窗: 6 months post burn

measurement of self esteem related to scar quality

次要结局

  • ● hypertrophic surface area(12 months post burn)
  • ● quality of scar (patient and observer)(12 months post burn)
  • ● scar elasticity, vascularisation and pigmentation,(12 months post burn)
  • ● functional and/or anatomic impairments,(12 months post burn)
  • ● mimic function(12 months post burn)

研究者

发起方
Association of Dutch Burn Centres
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (3)

Loading locations...

相似试验