跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03599856
NCT03599856Unknown不适用

TraceBook: the Clinical Proof of Concept on the Intensive Care.

Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 408 人开始时间: 2018年6月2日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
408
试验地点
2
主要终点
Checked items

研究概览

简要总结

The effectiveness of current checklists is hampered by lack of acceptance and compliance. Recently, a new type of checklist with dynamic properties has been created to provide more specific checklist items for each individual patient. The proof of concept of this dynamic clinical checklist (DCC; BJA 2017 (DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex129)) was tested in a simulation trial with improved outcomes and high acceptance scores. The purpose of this study is to investigate if the outcomes of this real-life clinical proof of concept study are similar with the outcomes of the simulation trial for the intensive care unit (ICU) ward.

详细描述

Method A prospective single center (Catharina Hospital Eindhoven) controlled before-and-after study.

The before period will be used as control group in which ward rounds and nurse handovers will be observed by the investigators for two months. Then TraceBook will be introduced and clinicians, ICU doctors and nurses, will be able to use checklists of TraceBook for ward rounds, their shifts and handovers in which they will be observed for two months. The goal is at least 120 observations per period.

Endpoints The primary outcome is the percentage of items that were checked per ward rounds and nurse handovers during the before and the after implementation period. Secondary outcomes will be clinical outcomes of admitted patients, pharmacist specific outcomes, specific checkable item related outcomes, and user experience and acceptance scores.

Hypothesis TraceBook, with the use of digital dynamic checklists, improves compliance to care processes on the intensive care with a high user acceptance score.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Sequential
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Physicians working on the ICU
  • All admitted patients on the ICU during the study periods.

排除标准

  • Physicians objecting participation in the trial

结局指标

主要结局

Checked items

时间窗: 24 hours (each day)

The percentage of daily checked checkable items overall and items requiring an intervention per patient.

次要结局

  • Pharmacists' interventions(4 months)
  • Incorrect prescribed proton pump inhibitors(4 months)
  • Opiates use(4 months)
  • User experience(6 months)
  • Ventilator days(9 months)
  • Sedation days(9 months)
  • Number of gastro-intestinal bleedings(4 months)
  • Incorrect prescribed anticoagulation or thrombosis prophylaxis.(4 months)
  • Central-venous-catheter-related bloodstream infections.(4 months)
  • Spontaneous breathing trials(4 months)
  • Sedation wake up calls(4 months)
  • Antibiotics use(4 months)
  • Complication registration(4 months)
  • Length of stay(9 months)
  • Daily intensive care medication alerts(4 months)
  • Ventilator and hospital associated pneumonia on the intensive care.(4 months)
  • Incorrect prescribed selective digestive decontamination(4 months)
  • Energy deficit(4 months)
  • User acceptance(6 months)
  • Hedonic and pragmatic quality(6 months)
  • Intravenous sedatives use(4 months)
  • Automatically checked items(4 months)
  • User experience outcomes(6 months)
  • Mortality(9 months)

研究者

发起方
Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ashley De Bie

Physician-scientist

Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验