Trauma Informed Childhood Obesity Care for Low-Income Minorities in Primary Care

Health care provider satisfaction of FOCUS TIC-COM

时间窗: Last 6 months of Year 2 of study

The investigators plan to collect health care provider satisfaction in delivering the FOCUS TIC-COM. The investigators will measure satisfaction of various elements of the intervention using a 5 point Satisfaction Likert scale, where 1 means "very unsatisfied" and 5 means "very satisfied".

Parent / Caregiver satisfaction of FOCUS TIC-COM

时间窗: Last 6 months of Year 2 of study

The investigators plan to collect parent / caregiver satisfaction in receiving the FOCUS TIC-COM intervention. The investigators will measure satisfaction of various elements of the intervention using a 5 point Satisfaction Likert scale, where 1 means "very unsatisfied" and 5 means "very satisfied".

Feasibility and acceptability of delivering FOCUS TIC-COM in the primary care setting, as perceived by caregivers/parents of low-income minority obese children and their providers

时间窗: Last 6 months of Year 2 of study

The investigators will conduct focus groups with both health care providers and parents/caregivers of overweight/obese children exposed to FOCUS TIC-COM to assess intervention feasibility and acceptability. The investigators will ask questions in the focus group discussion on whether the Primary Care Provider-mediated FOCUS TIC-COM is relevant, appropriate and sustainable for the primary care setting and if the intervention should be disseminated. In addition, the investigators will examine the demand, practicality, adaptation, integration, expansion and efficacy of the intervention through the focus group discussion. The focus group questions will be derived from the RE-AIM framework: Reach into the target population; Effectiveness / Efficacy; Adaptation by target settings, institutions, and staff; Implementation - consistency and cost of delivery; Maintenance of intervention effects.

RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method - Expert Panel Ratings / Consensus

时间窗: Four rounds of rating over the course of 6 month to 1 year (Year 1 of study)

The investigators plan to use a modified Delphi procedure called the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to reach consensus regarding the content and implementation of a Primary Care Provider-mediated FOCUS TIC-COM approach to address childhood obesity in low-income minority communities. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method consists of four rounds of rating clinical indicators or practice guidelines derived from current literature on TIC that will be incorporated into the current standard of childhood obesity prevention and management. A benefit-to-cost ratio will be rated on a 9 point Likert scale, where 1 means that the expected harms greatly outweigh the expected benefits in relation to cost, and 9 means that the expected benefits greatly outweigh the expected harms in relation to cost. Necessity rating scale will be on a Likert scale of 1 to 9, where 1 means that the practice guideline is not necessary at all, and 9 means that the practice guideline is extremely necessary.

FOCUS TIC-COM Training Evaluation - Provider's Perceived confidence

时间窗: Baseline and immediately after training (Year 2 of study)

The investigators plan to conduct a pre/post training evaluation measuring perceived confidence in FOCUS TIC-COM approach for overweight/obese children. The investigators will use a 5 point likert scale to measure confidence level in FOCUS TIC-COM approach, where 1 means "not confident at all" and 5 means "very confident". The 5 point likert scale for confidence has the following values: 1 means "not confident at all"; 2 means "not very confident"; 3 means "somewhat confident"; 4 means "fairly confident"; and 5 means "very confident".