跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04705363
NCT04705363已完成不适用

A Sociolinguistic-enabled Web Application to Develop Precision Health Intervention for African Americans

University of Florida2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 751 人开始时间: 2021年6月29日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
751
试验地点
2
主要终点
Intention to Talk to Doctor About Colorectal Cancer Screening

研究概览

简要总结

This pilot study will explore the preliminary efficacy of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening intervention delivered by Virtual Human Agents (VHAs). Seven hundred fifty participants aged 45 to 75 will be recruited through Qualtrics panels. The study examines how different levels of dialectal linguistic features willingness to be screened for colorectal cancer. Participants will be randomly assigned to interact with one of four VHA conditions: a VHA using non-dialectal linguistic features, a VHA with a low level of dialectal linguistic features integrated, a VHA with a high level of dialectal linguistic features integrated, or a text-only control condition. Following the interaction, participants will complete survey measures to assess perceived willingness to be screened.

详细描述

African Americans experience significant health inequities, including higher morbidity and mortality rates due to colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to White Americans. While the causes of these disparities are complex, regular screening can help reduce them. However, adherence to CRC screening guidelines remains low, particularly among African Americans.

One strategy to reduce CRC screening disparities is using strategic communication interventions to promote the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). FIT is a low-cost, non-invasive screening method that alleviates common patient barriers to CRC screening and is as effective as colonoscopy in reducing CRC incidence and mortality.

Tailored messaging interventions have been shown to improve CRC screening rates. However, two critical questions must be addressed before implementing tailored screening interventions within healthcare systems: (1) To what extent must message content be tailored to be effective? and (2) How can participants be effectively engaged?

This study builds upon an existing project that utilizes mobile Virtual Human Technology (VHT) to deliver tailored CRC screening messages. Virtual Human Agents (VHAs) provide a unique opportunity to customize communication strategies, including linguistic adaptation, to align with patient preferences. Such interventions can help mitigate CRC screening barriers such as cultural mismatch and low self-efficacy.

This study investigates explicitly the role of dialectal linguistic features in shaping willingness to be screened for CRC. The pilot study is exploratory in nature and seeks to examine the following aim: To assess how tailoring the dialectal variety of VHA speech affects willingness to be screened for CRC.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Screening
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

盲法说明

Participants will be blind to condition. Investigators will be blind to which participants will be assigned to which interventions.

入排标准

年龄范围
45 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Out of guidelines for colorectal cancer screening
  • No fecal immunochemical test within the last 12 months
  • No colonoscopy within the last ten years)

排除标准

  • Must meet inclusion criteria

结局指标

主要结局

Intention to Talk to Doctor About Colorectal Cancer Screening

时间窗: Immediately after the intervention, up to 1 hour

Measure: Intention to talk to a doctor about colorectal cancer screening. Construct: Behavioral intention to communicate Item: The virtual appointment made me want to discuss colon cancer screening options with my doctor. Participants will respond using three 5-point Likert scales that will be summed. The total score ranges from 3 to 15, with higher scores indicating a greater intention to discuss colorectal cancer screening with a healthcare professional. Mean scores closer to 3 reflect lower intention, while mean scores closer to 15 reflect higher intention.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验