NL-OMON23431已完成不适用
Enema versus high doses of PEG 3350 in the treatment of rectal fecal impaction.
geen0 个研究点目标入组 90 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 90
研究概览
简要总结
/A
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •1. Age 4-18 years;
- •2. Fecal impaction upon rectal exam.
排除标准
- •1. Previous colonic surgery;
- •2. Organic cause of constipation;
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Enema versus high doses of PEG 3350 in the treatment of rectal faecal impactioConstipationDigestive SystemOther functional intestinal disordersISRCTN71579145Academic Medical Centre (AMC) (Netherlands)90
进行中（未招募）
不适用
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube feeding in patients with esophageal cancer scheduled for chemoradiotherapyNutritionCancer - Oesophageal (gullet)Diet and Nutrition - Other diet and nutrition disordersEsophageal cancerACTRN12616000697482Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil29
已完成
3 期
Comparator Study of PEG 3350 Versus Prucalopride in Females With Chronic ConstipationConstipationNCT01251822Norgine240
Unknown
3 期
Efficacy and Safety of PEG 3350 for Treatment of Chronic ConstipationConstipation - FunctionalNCT03957668Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia184
已完成
4 期
Polyethyleneglycol3350 vs Tegaserod in Treatment of Patients With Chronic ConstipationConstipationNCT00153140Braintree Laboratories239