Autogenous Mineralized and Partial Demineralized Dentin Graft Compared to Freeze Dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized Control Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 45
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Clinical-radiographical differences in terms of bone density between dentin tooth grafts and FDBA.
研究概览
简要总结
The bone grafting materials currently used in dentistry are autografts, allografts, xenografts, and alloplastic grafts. Among these different types of bone graft materials, autografts are considered to have the most predictable results due to its properties of osteogenesis, osteoinduction and osteoconduction. However, bone autografts are rarely used due to the high morbidity associated with harvesting the bone graft from the patient with a second surgical site. Because of the increased risk to the patient with autogenous bone grafts, the current standard of care is an allograft, which is a bone graft harvested from cadaver sources such as Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA). While allografts can only possess the qualities of osteoinduction and osteoconduction, they also have dramatically less morbidity due to the lack of a second surgical site.
Studies have shown that autogenous dentin grafts promote all three ideal mechanisms for bone regeneration. There are two methods to generate autogenous dentin grafts. One is to collect the extracted tooth and to send it to a tooth bank for the preparation process. The second is to process the extracted tooth in a clinical setting chairside, for a graft. A dentin graft can undergo different treatments such as demineralization, mineralization, and partial-demineralization. Although the autogenous dentin graft has shown positive results for bone regeneration, the comparison between partial-demineralized, mineralized autogenous dentin grafts, and freeze-dried bone grafts in the clinical setting for immediate grafting has not been studied in humans. Thus, there is a need to study the benefits of autogenous dentin partial-demineralized and mineralized grafts versus freeze-dried bone allografts regarding clinical, radiographically (bone volume and density), and efficacy results. This research addresses these areas of need.
详细描述
The bone grafting materials currently used in dentistry are autografts, allografts, xenografts, and alloplastic grafts. Among these different types of bone graft materials, autografts are considered to have the most predictable results due to its properties of osteogenesis, osteoinduction and osteoconduction. However, bone autografts are rarely used due to the high morbidity associated with harvesting the bone graft from the patient with a second surgical site. Because of the increased risk to the patient with autogenous bone grafts, the current standard of care is an allograft, which is a bone graft harvested from cadaver sources such as Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA). While allografts can only possess the qualities of osteoinduction and osteoconduction, they also have dramatically less morbidity due to the lack of a second surgical site.
Studies have shown that autogenous dentin grafts promote all three ideal mechanisms for bone regeneration. There are two methods to generate autogenous dentin grafts. One is to collect the extracted tooth and to send it to a tooth bank for the preparation process. The second is to process the extracted tooth in a clinical setting chairside, for a graft. A dentin graft can undergo different treatments such as demineralization, mineralization, and partial-demineralization. Although the autogenous dentin graft has shown positive results for bone regeneration, the comparison between partial-demineralized, mineralized autogenous dentin grafts, and freeze-dried bone grafts in the clinical setting for immediate grafting has not been studied in humans. Thus, there is a need to study the benefits of autogenous dentin partial-demineralized and mineralized grafts versus freeze-dried bone allografts regarding clinical, radiographically (bone volume and density), and efficacy results. This research addresses these areas of need.
A. Specific Aims
Specific Aim 1:
Is there a clinical-radiographical difference in terms of bone volume and density between mineralized dentin grafts, partial demineralized tooth grafts, and FDBA?
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Adult patients ≥18 years old
- •Able to understand and sign a written informed consent form and willing to fulfil all study requirements.
- •Alveolar sockets with intact four-wall architecture.
- •Patients with at least a tooth that need to be extracted.
排除标准
- •Uncontrolled systemic disease
- •Currently smoking >10 cigarettes per day
- •History of head and/or neck radiotherapy in the past five years
- •Bisphosphonates current use or history of IV bisphosphonate
- •Pregnant, expecting to become pregnant, or lactating women.
- •Presence of active periodontal disease.
- •Teeth that underwent root canal fillings
- •Teeth with acute infection at the site of extraction.
- •Teeth with periapical infection
结局指标
主要结局
Clinical-radiographical differences in terms of bone density between dentin tooth grafts and FDBA.
时间窗: 6 months post guided bone regeneration procedure
Is there a clinical-radiographical difference in terms of bone density between mineralized dentin grafts, partial demineralized tooth grafts and FDBA, as measured with Hounsfield Units?
Clinical-radiographical differences in terms of bone volume between dentin tooth grafts and FDBA.
时间窗: 6 months post guided bone regeneration procedure
Is there a clinical-radiographical difference in terms of bone volume between mineralized dentin grafts, partial demineralized tooth grafts and FDBA, as measured in millimeters, with calibrated devices?
次要结局
- Surgical efficiency utilizing dentin tooth graft and FDBA.(6 months post guided bone regeneration procedure)
- Surgical cost saving measurement utilizing dentin tooth graft and FDBA.(6 months post guided bone regeneration procedure)