跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01074255
NCT01074255已完成不适用

Re-examination Study For General Drug Use to Assess the Safety and Efficacy Profile of EMEND in Usual Practice

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC0 个研究点目标入组 3,546 人开始时间: 2007年4月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
3,546
主要终点
Investigator Global Assessment of Participants' Response to Therapy With EMEND (Aprepitant) for the Prevention of Acute and Delayed Nausea Following Chemotherapy

研究概览

简要总结

This survey is conducted for preparing application materials for re-examination under the Pharmaceutical Affairs Laws and its Enforcement Regulation. Its aim is to reconfirm the clinical usefulness of EMEMD (aprepitant) through collecting the safety information according to the Re-examination Regulation for New Drugs.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Participants who are treated with EMEND for the first time as per the EMEND label

排除标准

  • Contraindication to EMEND

研究组 & 干预措施

Korean Participants Treated With EMEND (aprepitant)

Participants receiving EMEND on Treatment Days 1, 2, and 3 concomitantly with a corticosteroid and a 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) antagonist.

干预措施: EMEND (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Investigator Global Assessment of Participants' Response to Therapy With EMEND (Aprepitant) for the Prevention of Acute and Delayed Nausea Following Chemotherapy

时间窗: Up to 14 days following the cessation of treatment

The investigators assessed a participant's response to therapy with EMEND to prevent acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of chemotherapy when used concomitantly with other antiemetics. The response categories were: excellent (best possible anticipated response, considering the severity and stage of disease), good (good response, but less than the best possible anticipated response), fair (definite response, but could be better), poor (minimal response, unacceptable), or none (no response, absence of drug effect).

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验