CTRI/2020/10/028221尚未招募2 期
A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF EARLY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL USE OF INOTROPES IN CHILDRENS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK
nil0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •children with sepsis and shock
排除标准
- •children received i.v fluid from outside
- •severe anemia
- •diabetic ketoacidosis
- •severe acute malnutrition
- •chronic systemic illness
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
TOPICAL LOCAL ANAESTHETIC SPRAY WITH VAPOCOOLANT VERSUS EMLA CREAM IN INFANTS DURING VACCINATIOCTRI/2021/05/033426DR AYUSH JAI228
尚未招募
不适用
small swelling on the wristCTRI/2018/10/016222Dr ESWARA REDDY G
已完成
不适用
Study to compare effect of method of providing oxygen at high flows with high flow nasal cannula vs conventional method of providing oxygen using bag and mask on time duration for which patient can maintain oxygen saturation.CTRI/2018/03/012870Dr Sanjeevani Zadkar60
招募中
4 期
Comparison of three methods of pain relief in patients undergoing gall bladder surgeryCTRI/2013/03/003493I150
招募中
不适用
Comparing the standard digital technique of using a larygeal mask airway versus videolaryngoscope guided insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airwayCTRI/2021/09/036259SRM Medical College Hospital