An Evaluation Study of a Text-Based Chest CT-Assisted Diagnostic System: A Two-stage, Multicenter, Multireader Multicase (MRMC), Self-Crossover Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 2
研究概览
简要总结
This study aims to find out if an artificial intelligence (AI) system can help experienced radiologists write chest CT scan reports more quickly without lowering the quality of the report. Chest CT scans are common, and writing reports for them is a major part of a radiologist's job. In this trial, board-certified radiologists will interpret complex chest CT cases. For some cases, they will start with a complete draft report generated by the AI system, which they can review and edit as needed. For other cases, they will write the report from scratch without any AI help, following their usual routine. The main things we are measuring are: 1) how much time the AI draft saves, and 2) whether the final reports created with AI help are as good as or better than those written without it, as judged by other senior doctors who do not know which report came from which method. The hope is that this AI tool can make radiologists' work more efficient while maintaining high standards for patient care.
详细描述
This study investigates whether an artificial intelligence (AI) system that drafts preliminary radiology reports can help experienced chest CT radiologists work faster while maintaining or improving report quality. The trial is conducted in two sequential phases. The first phase uses a set of complex, real-world historical cases. Radiologists interpret these cases both with and without the help of the AI-generated draft (AI-report) in a controlled, crossover study design. The second phase is a prospective, real-world deployment where the same AI-report system is integrated into the clinical workflow of participating radiologists as they interpret new, incoming chest CT scans in real time. We measure the time it takes to complete reports and, through blinded evaluations by other senior doctors, assess the quality of the final reports created with and without AI assistance. The goal is to determine if this AI tool can make radiologists' work more efficient and support high-quality patient care in actual practice.
1. Detailed Description
1.1 Study Design
This is a two-phase, multicenter, multireader, multicase (MRMC) study designed to evaluate the real-world clinical utility of an AI report generation system (AI-report).
- Stage 1 (controlled crossover evaluation): This stage employs a retrospective, randomized, two-period crossover design. A curated set of complex historical chest CT cases, previously discussed in multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, is used. Each participating radiologist acts as their own control, interpreting the same cases both with and without the AI draft under controlled conditions.
- Stage 2 (prospective real-world deployment): This stage is a prospective, observational study. The validated AI-report system is deployed into the live clinical workflow of the participating radiologists. They use the system in real-time as they interpret new, consecutive chest CT scans from their clinical duties, allowing for evaluation in an authentic clinical environment.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Diagnostic
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Active board certification and ongoing routine clinical practice as an attending radiologist
- •Independent institutional authority for chest CT image interpretation and final official diagnostic report issuance
- •A minimum of three years of post-certification clinical experience in specialized thoracic imaging
- •Legal and cognitive competence for study participation, with voluntary provision of written informed consent after full understanding of study purpose, procedures, risks and benefits
排除标准
- •Direct participation in the development, training or validation of the trial's evaluated AI system
- •Ongoing participation in concurrent studies with potential risks of interpretation bias, cognitive fatigue or study procedure interference (investigator-assessed)
- •Any actual or perceived conflict of interest related to the evaluated AI system or its developers that may compromise objectivity in image interpretation and diagnostic reporting