跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06912256
NCT06912256已完成不适用

Influence Of Individualized Two Weeks Mild Sleep Restriction On Tactical Performance During Small-Sided Games In National Male Under-19 Football Players: A Randomized Trial

José Afonso Coelho Neves1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 16 人开始时间: 2023年5月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
16
试验地点
1
主要终点
Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI)

研究概览

简要总结

The goal was to evaluate the influence that chronic sleep restriction may have on football players tactical performance during small-sided games. By using a relative sleep restriction (i.e., by reducing the normal sleep duration by 15%) instead of an absolute sleep restriction (e.g., 3-4 hours), different sleep schedules were applied, according to the players individual sleep profile. It was hypothesized that the player's performance would be impaired, particularly their tactical behaviors when performing a 4x4 small-sided game format.

详细描述

An impairment on cognitive and physical performance is commonly suggested in literature. However, there is a lack of information regarding sport-specific parameters. Thus, the present study aimed to examine whether chronic sleep restriction during 9 consecutive days impairs the tactical performance of football players during small-sided games (SSGs). A total of sixteen national level male football players wore wrist actigraphy units during night sleep throughout the study. Players were randomized into two groups: intervention (IG), and control (CG). The first four days corresponded to a familiarization period, where players were informed about the study procedures and started using wrist actigraphy. Throughout the next seven consecutive days, the characterization phase of sleep players profile (i.e., baseline) was collected and analyzed. Then, players entered the intervention phase, where the IG slept 15% less than routine. During this 9-days period, players performed a 4x4 SSGs in two moments (moment 1 and moment 2) with a week interval. The SSGs were recorded using a video camera and subsequently analyzed using the Game Performance Assessment Instrument.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Basic Science
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
— 至 19 Years(Child, Adult)
性别
Male
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Soccer players classified as Tier 3, corresponding to the National Level in accordance to McKay et al. (2022), as they represented the under-19 team playing in the Portuguese National Championship 1st Division.

排除标准

  • •players with previously identified sleep disorders;
  • •players with injuries that prevented them from playing SSGs.

研究组 & 干预措施

Sleep restriction

Experimental

During the intervention period (i.e., 9 consecutive days), the intervention group started the sleep protocol, sleeping only the quantity of hours defined for their individual chronic partial sleep restriction (15% of usual daily sleep hours). The amount and quality of sleep obtained were daily monitored through actigraphy devices, and all the players filled in a sleep diary when they woke up. During this period, players performed the SSGs in two different moments (moment 1 and moment 2), interspersed by 4 days.

干预措施: Sleep restriction (Behavioral)

Controls

No Intervention

Same intervention (i.e., soccer training and tests) as the other arm, but with no sleep restriction.

结局指标

主要结局

Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI)

时间窗: Applied once in week 1 and once again in week 2

According to study purposes, tactical performance was defined as the main variables. Tactical analysis was performed using the Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI), a tool designed to evaluate the individual tactical behavior (Memmert \& Harvey, 2008; Oslin, Mitchell, \& Griffin, 1998). It consists of seven components, two of which are evaluated when the player has the ball and the remaining five when the player does not have the ball possession. For example, decisions made about what to do with the ball during the game, and motor skill execution were classified as appropriate/efficient or inappropriate/inefficient. The main index proposed by Oslin et al. (1998) was calculated: Game Performance (GP). Based on actions deemed appropriate or inappropriate, the final score can range from 0 to 100%, with higher values denoting better outcomes.

次要结局

  • Sleep efficiency(Collected daily during the two weeks of the intervention)

研究者

发起方
José Afonso Coelho Neves
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

José Afonso Coelho Neves

Supervisor of the lead author's Master Thesis

Universidade do Porto

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验