跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05224479
NCT05224479撤回不适用

Clinical Validation of Machine Learning Triage of Chest Radiographs

Stanford University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2022年8月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
试验地点
1
主要终点
Turnaround time

研究概览

简要总结

Artificial intelligence and machine learning have the potential to transform the practice of radiology, but real-world application of machine learning algorithms in clinical settings has been limited. An area in which machine learning could be applied to radiology is through the prioritization of unread studies in a radiologist's worklist. This project proposes a framework for integration and clinical validation of a machine learning algorithm that can accurately distinguish between normal and abnormal chest radiographs. Machine learning triage will be compared with traditional methods of study triage in a prospective controlled clinical trial. The investigators hypothesize that machine learning classification and prioritization of studies will result in quicker interpretation of abnormal studies. This has the potential to reduce time to initiation of appropriate clinical management in patients with critical findings. This project aims to provide a thoughtful and reproducible framework for bringing machine learning into clinical practice, potentially benefiting other areas of radiology and medicine more broadly.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
Single (Participant)

盲法说明

Radiologists will be blinded when using machine learning and random triage methods.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Radiologist at Stanford Hospital and Clinics

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Traditional workflow triage

Active Comparator

Radiologists follow standard triage of chest radiographs.

干预措施: Traditional workflow triage (Other)

Traditional workflow triage

Active Comparator

Radiologists follow standard triage of chest radiographs.

干预措施: Machine learning workflow triage (Other)

Traditional workflow triage

Active Comparator

Radiologists follow standard triage of chest radiographs.

干预措施: Random workflow triage (Other)

Machine learning workflow triage

Active Comparator

Radiologists follow machine learning triage of chest radiographs.

干预措施: Traditional workflow triage (Other)

Machine learning workflow triage

Active Comparator

Radiologists follow machine learning triage of chest radiographs.

干预措施: Machine learning workflow triage (Other)

Machine learning workflow triage

Active Comparator

Radiologists follow machine learning triage of chest radiographs.

干预措施: Random workflow triage (Other)

Random workflow triage

Sham Comparator

Radiologists follow randomly ordered triage of chest radiographs.

干预措施: Traditional workflow triage (Other)

Random workflow triage

Sham Comparator

Radiologists follow randomly ordered triage of chest radiographs.

干预措施: Machine learning workflow triage (Other)

Random workflow triage

Sham Comparator

Radiologists follow randomly ordered triage of chest radiographs.

干预措施: Random workflow triage (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Turnaround time

时间窗: up to 1 hour

Time from completion of radiograph to time that radiologist issues an assessment via preliminary or final report

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Emily Tsai

Clinical Assistant Professor

Stanford University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验