Effect of Progressive Relaxation Versus Isometric Exercises in Management of Primary Dysmenorrhea

The prevalence of dysmenorrhea varies between 16% and 91% in women of reproductive age, with severe pain in 2%-29% of the women studied. It has major implications for quality of life, such as limitation of daily activities and psychological stress, being one of the main causes of work absenteeism. Despite the significant effects on quality of life, the prevalence of primary dysmenorrhea is considered to be underestimated because women frequently do not seek medical treatment because of the commonly held belief that pain is an expected part of menstruation.

The prolonged use of NSAIDs is also associated with cardiovascular, hepatic, and renal problems. Likewise, oral contraceptives are not free from side effects either, as they increase the frequency of bleeding, weight gain, and risk of venous thromboembolism. So, there is a need for emphasis on alternative methods of conservative treatment as non-pharmacological and non-invasive therapy, as it is safe and easy to use for obtaining relief from dysmenorrhea symptoms.

Progressive relaxation exercises have been proven to have an impact on decreasing dysmenorrhea pain when they are practiced on a regular basis. Isometric exercises are easy and safe for sedentary population as the protocol is non-invasive and implemented at low intensity, and they are widely used in rehabilitation settings. Also, it is inexpensive as no special facilities or equipment are required, and not time-consuming. Hence, isometric exercises seems to be an appropriate non-pharmacological method for reducing the pain intensity of primary dysmenorrhea.

So, this study is an attempt to increase the body of knowledge in the field of physical therapy, as it will be the first one to investigate the difference between the effect of progressive relaxation exercises and isometric exercises in management of primary dysmenorrhea.