跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00328055
NCT00328055已完成不适用

Effects of an Easy to Read Advance Directive on Acceptability, Knowledge, and Self-efficacy Compared to a Standard Advance Directive

National Institute on Aging (NIA)2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2004年8月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
200
试验地点
2
主要终点
Acceptability

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to compare the acceptability, usefulness, self-efficacy and comprehension of an easy-to-read advance directive form versus a standard advance directive form written at a post graduate reading level.

详细描述

Advance directives are forms that allow patients to document their medical treatment preferences and to designate another person to help make medical decisions if they were to become too sick to make their own decisions. Most patients, even seriously ill older adults, do not fill out advance directive forms. Since the mean reading level in the US is at the 8th grade level (5th grade for elders) and since most advance directive documents are written beyond a 12th grade reading level, many patients may not be able to read, much less complete, the standard advance directive forms.

This study hypothesized that an advance directive form written at a 5th grade reading level (AD-Easy) that included culturally appropriate graphics explaining the text, and also included questions concerning patients' values, would be preferred over the standard advance directive form being used in California (AD-Standard).

The participant's literacy level and baseline knowledge of advance directive topics were assessed. Participants were then stratified by literacy level to be randomized to first attempt to read and complete either the AD-Easy or the AD-Standard. Then the participant's acceptance of the forms, self-efficacy or confidence with treatment decisions, attitudes about the form's utility, and post form review comprehension were assessed. Participants then crossed over to review the alternate form and were asked to state which form they preferred to take home. Six months later participants were called and asked if they had thought about their medical treatment preferences, spoken to their family, friends, or doctor about their treatment preferences, or if they filled out the advance directive form.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
盲法
Single

入排标准

年龄范围
50 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Over 50 years
  • Primary physician in the General Medicine Clinic at San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA
  • English- or Spanish-speaking

排除标准

  • Delirious

结局指标

主要结局

Acceptability

self-efficacy

attitudes about the forms utility

comprehension

preference

次要结局

  • 6 month outcomes included whether participant talked with their doctor about treatment wishes, talked to family, thought about treatment decisions, or filled out an advance directive

研究者

发起方
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
申办方类型
Nih

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison of an Easy to Read Advance Directive... | 临床试验