Study of the Strategy for Managing Urinary Incontinence With PRP

Urinary incontinence is a public health issue; in France, approximately 3 million women are affected.

Current treatment options-particularly surgical procedures involving the use of prosthetic materials-are being called into question. In 2019, the use of vaginal prostheses for prolapse was banned. The two sub-urethral sling (SUS) techniques are being challenged at medical conferences and within scientific committees, as they can lead to adverse effects and disastrous complications. Patient advocacy groups are emerging (such as "Balance ta Bandelette"), and media reports are proliferating to pressure authorities to withdraw all prosthetic materials from the market.

PRP (Platelet-Rich Plasma) is a technique widely used in cosmetology and rheumatology that could also be applied to the treatment of urinary incontinence. It is known to stimulate the body's natural repair mechanisms, thereby improving tissue nutrition. It is also believed to exert a mechanical effect similar to that of slings.

Consequently, an injection into the anterior vaginal wall-a relatively painless procedure performed adjacent to the mid-urethra-could initially act as a bulking agent and subsequently promote tissue regeneration, mimicking the effect of a sling in cases of urethral hypermobility, while also strengthening the sphincter in cases of sphincter deficiency.

This study therefore aims to evaluate this treatment approach for patients seeking alternatives to slings.