跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/06/089886
CTRI/2025/06/089886尚未招募不适用

Tidal Volume Challenge to Reliably Predict Fluid Responsivness in Critically ill patient

IGIMS1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2025年7月30日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
To Study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of both tests for the prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with hemodynamic instability

研究概览

简要总结

Volume expansion is a cornerstone treatment of acute circulatory failure like during the early hours in patients with septic shock, but it can be a cause of therapeutic dilemma because fluid overload can lead to acute kidney injury, prolongation of mechanical ventilation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and higher mortality rates.

Predicting fluid responsiveness with a reliable, easy, and rapid way is essential to know when to start and when to stop fluid therapy especially as patients may react differently to VE.

Static hemodynamic parameters like inferior vena cava diameter and central venous pressure are unreliable and cannot predict FR precisely; contrarily, dynamic parameters that depend on cyclic changes in cardiac preload caused by mechanical ventilation, leading to variation of stroke volume or pulse pressure have proven to be reliable when predicting FR in hemodynamically unstable patient

PPV is a common dynamic parameter that can predict FR reliably and can be recorded through most of recent bedside monitors easily using arterial lines; also, it does not need CO monitoring or any other maneuvers to be done.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Not Applicable
盲法
Not Applicable

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 99.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Adult patients more than 18 years with hemodynamic instability who are intubated and mechanically ventilated with volume assist-control and using low tidal volume strategy.

排除标准

  • Age less than 18 years 2.Contraindication for PPV( Spontaneous breathing,cardiac arrthymias,open chest,right-side heart failure,pulmonary or intraabdominal hypertension)
  • Non consenting.

结局指标

主要结局

To Study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of both tests for the prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with hemodynamic instability

时间窗: 18 month

次要结局

  • 1. See compare hemodynamic changes in 2 groups(2. Side effect of fluid bolus)

研究者

发起方
IGIMS
申办方类型
Government medical college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

"Tidal Volume Challenge :A Practical Tool to Guide... | 临床试验