Feasibility, User Experiences, and Preliminary Effectiveness of Conversation Cards for Adolescents, a Patient-centered Communication and Behavior Change Tool: a Pragmatic, Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 终止
- 入组人数
- 31
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Feasibility outcomes for resource, management, and scientific assessments per open-ended questions outlined by Tickle-Degnen's (2013)
研究概览
简要总结
Providers are not opportunistic enough in addressing lifestyle habits of teens, and can benefit from appropriate tools to support their conversations with families as well as engage all family members in making changes. Since most teens with obesity do not meet minimum lifestyle recommendations, our team developed Conversation Cards for Adolescents (CCAs), a tool to help teens and providers communicate and set lifestyle goals together. In this study, the investigators will (i) observe if and how CCAs fit in a clinical setting for changing teen-provider interactions and teens's lifestyle habits, (ii) ask teens and providers for their thoughts on CCAs and how they are used, and (iii) determine preliminary impact of CCAs on teen behaviors and clinical factors. The investigators will do this with around 50 teens from a primary/secondary care clinic in Edmonton, Alberta. Teens will be randomized to one of two groups - one group will use CCAs in their appointment with their providers to set a goal for change, while the other will also set a goal for change, but without using CCAs. Results from this study will give us insight into how CCAs are best used in a clinical setting and will help us plan a future full-scale study.
详细描述
Background & Rationale. The high prevalence and adverse health risks of adolescent obesity are well-documented. Most adolescents with and without obesity do not meet minimum lifestyle recommendations for nutrition, physical and sedentary activities, and sleep, and care providers have identified a lack of tools and resources to help them better support families in lifestyle change and weight management. Best practices encourage the use of appropriate tools to augment discussions, in addition to the inclusion and engagement of all relevant stakeholders. Our team conducted a multi-phase project that included adolescents, care providers, and researchers to develop Conversation Cards for Adolescents (CCAs), an adolescent-tailored educational tool aimed at facilitating lifestyle behavior change in adolescents via collaborative goal-setting. This tool comprises a deck of 45 cards. Each card contains an individual statement pertaining to a barrier, enabler, or potential enabler that adolescents encounter in making and maintaining healthy lifestyle changes. These cards are organized across seven categorical suits: nutrition, physical activity, sedentary activity, sleep, mental health, relationships, and clinic factors. This deck is intended to be used by adolescents and providers and may be complementary to an already existing deck of cards (Conversation Cards©) created for parents and providers by our research team in 2012.
Objectives. To (i) assess the feasibility of the study design and procedures in a real-world practice setting, (ii) investigate future trial procedures, (iii) assess user experiences of CCAs, and (iv) determine the preliminary effectiveness of CCAs on changing behavioral and affective-cognitive outcomes for adolescents with obesity.
Method & Methodology. This is a pragmatic, pilot randomized controlled trial. Adolescents will be randomly allocated to one of two groups (CCAs or control) with a 1:1 allocation ratio and using permuted blocks of randomly varied sizes 2 and 4. Participant randomization will be performed in REDCap, based on allocation tables that have been generated and uploaded by the Data Coordinating Centre statistician. REDCap maintains an automated audit trail which includes the assigned study identification number, treatment allocation, and date and time of the transaction. The study coordinator will have access to REDcap onsite to randomize adolescents and will provide corresponding allocations to adolescents. The investigators will follow recommended sample sizes for pilot trials; that is, 25 individuals per trial arm for a total of 50, which gives the main trial a 90% power, 0.2 effect size, and two-sided 5% significance. Assuming a recruitment rate of ~85%, a margin of error for the confidence interval of around 10% was estimated; this recruitment rate is derived from similar randomized controlled trials conducted in a primary care setting surrounding obesity and lifestyle in children and youth. The investigators will adhere to the CONSORT statement for planning, conducting, and reporting pragmatic trials.
Recruitment.
Adolescents - Administrative and clinical (nurse) team members will approach families to gauge interest and obtain verbal consent. If given, the study coordinator on-site (MK) will approach families for more information (e.g., study description, developmental and language eligibility screening) and full consent/assent procedures. On the day of their medical appointment, clinic staff will measure adolescents' height and weight before they see their provider. Providers will be recruited by email or verbal invitation through existing relationships with research team members.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
An external party (Women and Children's Health Research Institute, University of Alberta) will run data analysis for the study.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 13 Years 至 17 Years(Child)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Adolescents are eligible to participate if they are:
- •13-17 years old
- •At a functioning grade level (English literacy and comprehension)
- •Interested in setting a lifestyle/behavioural goal related to improving diet, physical activity or sedentary activity, and
- •Seeking health services at the Northeast Community Health Centre (NECHC; Edmonton, Alberta, Canada)
- •All participating providers who deliver care to adolescents at the NECHC are eligible to participate.
排除标准
- •Our original eligibility criteria included a BMI ≥85th percentile. After recruiting the first five patients with overweight/obesity from March to August 2019, we decided to remove BMI eligibility criteria given the applicability of our tool's focus on lifestyle and adolescents across the weight spectrum, as well as to enhance recruitment. This decision was made by the research team in conjunction with clinical staff involved in the trial.
研究组 & 干预措施
Conversation Cards for Adolescents and Goal-Setting
Adolescents in the experimental arm will receive the tool 15 minutes prior to their appointment with their primary care provider. They will be instructed to familiarize themselves with the tool and to select the top 3 factors that resonate most with them in their attemps to change their lifestyle habits. They will then proceed to their clinical appointment to set one S.M.A.R.T. goal based on their selections and in collaboration with their primary care provider.
干预措施: Conversation Cards for Adolescents and Goal-Setting (Behavioral)
Goal-Setting
Adolescents in the control arm will not complete the tool activity, but will still set a S.M.A.R.T. goal with their primary care provider.
干预措施: Goal-Setting (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Feasibility outcomes for resource, management, and scientific assessments per open-ended questions outlined by Tickle-Degnen's (2013)
时间窗: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
The study coordinator will monitor and document study procedures and feasibility based on continuous observation at the site.
次要结局
- Appointment length using a timer on the study-specific iPad(Baseline)
- Collaborative goal-setting using the Patient Perception of Collaborative Goal-Setting(Baseline)
- Degree of effort and achievement of treatment goals using researcher-developed questions(3 weeks)
- Patient engagement: perspectives on priorities and study design using researcher-developed questions(3 weeks)
- User experience as per the User Experience Questionnaires(Baseline (pre-appt))
- User acceptance as per the Technology Acceptance Model(At study end point, an average of 1 year)
- Tool likeability (adolescents) using researcher-developed questions(Baseline)
- Tool usefulness (adolescents) using researcher-developed questions(Baseline)
- Tool feasibility (adolescents) using researcher-developed questions(Baseline)
- Tool usability (adolescents) using researcher-developed questions(Baseline)
- Tool likeability (PCPs) using researcher-developed questions(At study end point, an average of 1 year)
- Tool usefulness (PCPs) using researcher-developed questions(At study end point, an average of 1 year)
- Tool feasibility (PCPs) using researcher-developed questions(At study end point, an average of 1 year)
- Tool usability (PCPs) using researcher-developed questions(At study end point, an average of 1 year)
