跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02584530
NCT02584530已完成不适用

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Ultrasound Guided PICC Line Insertion in Neonates With Standard Procedure

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2016年7月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Time to complete the standard versus the US-guided procedure

研究概览

简要总结

This is a randomized controlled study comparing US guided vs standard procedure for PICC line placement in newborns admitted to Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Neonatal Intensive Care Unit who require a PICC line. Patients will be randomized using REDCap randomization module (stratified by gestational age < 28 weeks and >= 28 weeks and blocked to ensure approximate balance with each stratum) into two arms. - Arm 1: PICC line insertion procedure using anatomical landmarks and tip placement will be confirmed by X-ray (current standard); Arm 2: US guided PICC line insertion procedure and tip placement confirmation by both US and X-ray. Sample size of 33 infants per group would achieve greater than 80% power to detect a difference between groups.

Primary outcome: Time to complete the standard versus the US-guided procedure.

Secondary outcomes (comparison between two arms):

The number of total "venipuncture" attempts needed to place a PICC line Number of tip manipulations after complete insertion Proportion of successful tip placement

详细描述

Background Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line placement is one of the most commonly performed procedures in Neonatology. Due to prematurity and small vein size, the procedure often requires multiple attempts over an increased timeframe. As a standard of care, the position is confirmed by X-ray. Frequently, catheters are not optimally positioned, necessitating repositioning and further radiographs.

The use of ultrasound (US) guidance for PICC line placement enhances the visualization of the veins and provides a better selection for optimal access. It could decrease or even eliminate the need for X-rays when used to confirm the tip position.

Objectives To demonstrate that using US-guidance to place and confirm tip positioning for PICC line insertion in neonates will decrease the number of cannulation attempts, will shorten the time needed to complete the procedure, and will decrease infants' exposure to radiation.

Methods This is a randomized controlled study comparing US guided vs standard procedure for PICC line placement in newborns admitted to CHEO NICU who require a PICC line (approximately 130-150 infants per year). Patients will be randomized using REDCap randomization module (stratified by gestational age < 28 weeks and >= 28 weeks and blocked to ensure approximate balance with each stratum) into two arms - Arm 1: PICC line insertion procedure using anatomical landmarks and tip placement will be confirmed by X-ray (current standard); Arm 2: US guided PICC line insertion procedure and tip placement confirmation by both US and X-ray. A sample size of 33 infants per group would be sufficient to achieve greater than 80% power to detect a difference between groups.

Results of this study may demonstrate that US guided PICC line placement is superior (shorter and safer procedure, reduced radiation and pain) to currently used procedure and could lead to practice change.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
1 Day 至 28 Days(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All newborns (0-28 days) admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit who require PICC line insertion after consent has been obtained to include in this study. Including:
  • Infants who need prolonged Total Parenteral Nutrition requirement of > 7 days.
  • Infants with difficult peripheral venous access who requires a central line
  • Infants who require IV medications for > 7 days.
  • Infants who require medications given by central IV access
  • Infants who will undergo complex surgical procedures and will require central IV access before procedure.

排除标准

  • Infants requiring isolation according to infection control protocols
  • Unable to obtain or refused consent for PICC line and/or study enrolment
  • Infants with any clinical contraindication for PICC line insertion as per unit policy

结局指标

主要结局

Time to complete the standard versus the US-guided procedure

时间窗: one year

Comparison between total time of procedure with standard approach vs US guidance measured in minutes.

次要结局

  • Number of tip manipulations after complete insertion(One year)
  • Proportion of successful tip placement(One year)
  • Number of total venipuncture attempts needed to place a PICC line(One year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Nadya Ben Fadel

Neonatologist

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验