Endoscopic or Surgical Treatment of Complex Perianal Fistula. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 终止
- 入组人数
- 47
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- The recurrence rate of perianal fistula
研究概览
简要总结
This is a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the outcome of treatment of complex perianal fistula by Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) compared to fistulectomy and sphincter reconstruction as standard surgical procedure.
详细描述
The surgical treatment of complex fistulas is difficult and ideally aims to completely heal the fistula and prevent recurrence without affecting the anal sphincter function. The definitive surgical treatment options include transsphincteric fistulectomy and sphincter repair, intersphincteric ligation of the fistula tract (LIFT), transanal advancement flap and cutting Seton suture. All the methods caries a relative high recurrence and complication rate including the risk of anal incontinence .Transsphincteric fistulectomy and primary reconstruction of the anal sphincter has been reported to have a healing rate between 90 - 95,8 %, recurrence rate of 7,1-9,7 % and 5-30 % experience incontinence in varying degree. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) is a novel sphincter saving procedure for treating complex anal fistulas and recently introduced with promising early results with a healing rate of 74-87.1 % after 1 year. The procedure can be done as a day-case surgery with the ability of precise identification of the fistula tract, including the presence of secondary branches. The method includes an endoscopic debridement and closure of the internal opening. Only few scientific reports of the method has been published and only with short term results, and there is a need of validating the efficacy of this procedure in a prospective randomized trial. There are few randomised controlled trials in the literature on the treatment of complex anal fistulas treatment and there is no conclusive evidence of which method is the best. Furthermore the knowledge of changes in quality of life and functional results in terms of standardized continence evaluation and manometric studies are either contradictive or simply lacking after the surgery for anal fistulas. The aim of this study is to conduct a randomized clinical trial to compare VAAFT (mini invasive and sphincter-saving) with the traditional transsphincteric fistulectomy and primary reconstruction in terms of recurrence rate, manometric and functional changes as well as changes in quality of life.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients with complex transsphincteric anal fistulas >18 yrs old.
排除标准
- •Crohns fistulas
- •Signs of suppuration or/and branching.
- •Malignancy within 5 yrs.
- •Previous radiotherapy of the abdomen and pelvis.
- •Current Immune- suppressive treatment.
结局指标
主要结局
The recurrence rate of perianal fistula
时间窗: 6 months
A comparison on the rate of recurrence of anal fistula in each group will be performed by t-test. A p-value of less than 0.05 will be considered as statistical significant.
次要结局
- changes in quality of life score(baseline and 6 months)
- changes in fecal incontinence score(baseline and 6 months)
- changes in manometric study(baseline and 6 months)
研究者
Karam Matlub Sørensen
læge
University of Southern Denmark
