跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07344363
NCT07344363招募中不适用

Prostate Cancer REsearch Using Cross-validation of Innovative Sampling, Integrating LC-MS/MS for Optimized Therapeutic Drug moNitoring

Centro di Riferimento Oncologico - Aviano1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2025年11月19日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
To assess the reliability of innovative analytical methods based on DBS sampling for the quantification of abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide

研究概览

简要总结

Applying Dried Blood Spots (DBS) techniques to pharmacokinetic analysis could significantly streamline the use of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) in clinical practice. To establish DBS as a viable alternative sampling method, it is essential to demonstrate that results obtained from DBS analysis are reliable. This validation can be achieved through a cross-validation study. In this protocol, an original validated method, the plasma-based assay, serves as the "reference", while the alternative DBS-based analytical technique is the "comparator." The reliability will be defined analysing patients' samples with the new methods and comparing these results with those obtained with the reference LC-MS/MS (Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry) methods (in plasma). The possibility to apply DBS technique to pharmacokinetic analysis should largely facilitate the application of TDM to clinical practice.

详细描述

Applying Dried Blood Spots (DBS) techniques to pharmacokinetic analysis could significantly streamline the use of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) in clinical practice. To establish DBS as a viable alternative sampling method, it is essential to demonstrate that results obtained from DBS analysis are reliable. This validation can be achieved through a cross-validation study. In this protocol, an original validated method, the plasma-based assay, serves as the "reference", while the alternative DBS-based analytical technique is the "comparator." The reliability will be defined analysing patients' samples with the new methods and comparing these results with those obtained with the reference LC-MS/MS methods (in plasma). The possibility to apply DBS technique to pharmacokinetic analysis should largely facilitate the application of TDM to clinical practice.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Other
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients treated with abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide according to the dosing regimens described in the Summary of Product Characteristics. The treatment cycle does not matter but patients should be at the steady state (see section 4.2);• Age ≥18;
  • Signed informed consent is required

排除标准

  • Conditions that may limit the ability to adequately comply with the study procedures outlined in the protocol;
  • Refusal of informed consent;
  • Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, could compromise appropriate participation in the study.

结局指标

主要结局

To assess the reliability of innovative analytical methods based on DBS sampling for the quantification of abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide

时间窗: 24 months

The reliability will be assessed comparing results obtained with the new methods and with the reference LC-MS/MS methods (in plasma) evaluating the comprehensive results of the following analysis: 1. Calculation of Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (ρc) that quantifies the agreement between two measures of the same variable (e.g. chemical concentration); 2. Quantification of the mean difference and of the limits of agreement between the two methods with Bland-Altman method; 3. Evaluation of the slope and the intercept obtained using Passing-Bablok regression analysis; 4. Check for agreement with FDA/EMA guidelines requirements: the difference between the results obtained with the new method and the results obtained with the gold standard assay (% difference) should be within 20% in least two-thirds (67%) of the samples analyzed

次要结局

  • To collect preliminary data regarding intra-patient (consecutive samples collected from the same patient) variability of Cmin values;(24 months)
  • To collect preliminary data regarding inter-patient (samples from different patients treated at the same drug dose) variability of Cmin values;(24 months)
  • To conduct a preliminary evaluation of the correlation between drug exposure and toxicity(24 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验