跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07813065
NCT07813065尚未招募不适用

Repair Versus Replacement of Failed Restorations in Primary Teeth: Protocol for a Non-Inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial

University of Sao Paulo1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 382 人开始时间: 2026年10月7日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
382
试验地点
1
主要终点
Restoration survival

研究概览

简要总结

Dental caries affect approximately 573 million children globally, and the management of failed restorations is a frequent clinical issue in pediatric dentistry. Although complete replacement of restorations is traditionally the most commonly adopted approach, repair represents a minimally invasive alternative that preserves healthy dental structure and reduces the risk of pulpal complications. Studies in permanent teeth demonstrate that repair may present longevity similar to replacement; however, there is no robust evidence regarding this comparison in primary teeth. This randomized controlled clinical trial, with parallel groups and a 1:1 allocation ratio, aims to evaluate the non-inferiority of repair compared with replacement of failed restorations in primary molars, using encapsulated high-viscosity glass ionomer cement. Children aged 4 to 8 years with at least one failed restoration eligible for repair in primary molars will be included. Randomization will be stratified by number of surfaces. Teeth (n=824) will be randomly allocated to one of the groups: repair or replacement. The primary outcome will be restoration survival at 24 months. Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated as a secondary outcome. Statistical analysis will use Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression with shared frailty (¿=5%).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
4 Years 至 8 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Children aged 4 to 8 years;
  • Presence of at least one defective restoration in a primary molar, involving no more than 3 surfaces;
  • Absence of clinical and radiographic signs of pulp involvement;

排除标准

  • Tooth without pulp vitality or requiring endodontic treatment;
  • Loose or mobile restoration;
  • Presence of fistula, abscess, or history of pain;
  • Tooth mobility incompatible with the physiological exfoliation timeline;
  • Parents/guardians who do not consent to participation by signing the ICF, or children who do not assent to participate in the study.

研究组 & 干预措施

Repair

Experimental

Repair of Failed restoration in primary teeth.

干预措施: Repair of Failed Restoration (Procedure)

Replacement

Active Comparator

Replacement of Failed Restoration in primary teeth.

干预措施: Replacement of Failed Restoration (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Restoration survival

时间窗: 24 months

Restoration survival will be assessed based on clinical evaluation of the restorations at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. A restoration will be considered to have survived when it remains clinically satisfactory according to the following criteria. Single-surface restorations will be considered satisfactory when scored as 0 (restoration present and satisfactory), 1 (restoration present, with a slight marginal defect and/or surface wear of less than 0.5 mm in depth, with no need for repair), or 7 (restoration present, with gradual wear involving larger areas of the restoration but less than 0.5 mm in depth at the deepest point, with no need for repair), according to Frencken et al. (1996). Multiple-surface restorations will be considered satisfactory when scored as 00 (restoration present and satisfactory) or 10 (restoration present, with a slight marginal defect and/or surface wear of less than 0.5 mm in depth, with no need for repair), according to Rôlevald et al. (2006).

次要结局

  • Treatment success(24 months)
  • Parents' and Child's Preference(Before randomization and prior to treatment)
  • Treatment Time(From the beginning to the completion of the treatment procedure)
  • Child's Perception(Immediately after the procedure (Day 0))
  • Parents'/Guardians' Satisfaction(Immediately after the procedure (Day 0))
  • Parents'/Guardians' Willingness to Choose the Treatment Again(30 days after the procedure)
  • Cost-effectiveness(24 months)
  • Treatment Cost(Immediately after the procedure (Day 0))

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Tamara Kerber Tedesco

Assistant Professor

University of Sao Paulo

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验