跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05746026
NCT05746026已完成不适用

Effectiveness of Psycho-educational Program on Climate Change Distress and Risk Perception Among Older Adults.

Alexandria University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 80 人开始时间: 2022年3月5日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
80
试验地点
1
主要终点
Climate Change Distress and Impairment Scale (CC-DIS):

研究概览

简要总结

Research design The study followed a quasi-experimental study with two groups (study and control group) with a pre-test and post-test.

Setting:

This study was conducted at three elderly clubs at Damanhour city, El-Behaira Governorate, Egypt. These clubs are affiliated to the Ministry of Social Solidarity, Egypt namely Ahbab Allah, Alfady, and Alrabie Clubs. These clubs opens seven days per week from 9 am to 12 pm. The total attendance rate of older adults in these clubs amounted to 213; 93 older adults in Alfady Club, 70 in Ahbab Allah Club and 50 older adults in Alrabie Club.

详细描述

  • An Official letter from the Faculty of Nursing, Damanhour University was directed to the director of the Ministry of Social Solidarity in El -Behira governorate to obtain permission to conduct the study, then to the directors of the three elderly clubs in Damanhour city to obtain their approval to carry out the study.
  • A Socio-Demographic Data and clinical Structured Interview Schedule (tool II) was developed by the researchers based on review of related literature. The Arabic version of tool I (Mini-Mental State Examination) and tool IV (Risk Perception Scale) were used in this study.
  • The study subjects who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were interviewed individually in the garden of the clubs in order to collect the necessary data (tool I, II, III, and IV). Then, the researcher interviewed the clients in group composed of 8 older adults to implement program. Each session taken about 30-45 minutes.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
60 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Aged 60 years and above.
  • •Able to communicate effectively.
  • •Did not have malignancies or psychiatric diseases.

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

STUDY GROUP

Experimental

• The study subjects who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were interviewed individually in the garden of the clubs in order to collect the necessary data (tool I, II, III, and IV). Then, the researcher interviewed the clients in group composed of 8 older adults to implement the Psycho-educational Program . Each session taken about 30-45 minutes.

干预措施: Psycho-educational Program (Behavioral)

Control group

Active Comparator

Control group exposed to the usual routine care

干预措施: Psycho-educational Program (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Climate Change Distress and Impairment Scale (CC-DIS):

时间窗: 2 weeks

It was developed by Hepp et al., (2022) to assesses level of different types of affect in response to climate (Anger, Anxiety, and Sadness) in addition, climate change impairment (CCI) that cover general, social, and work related impairment. It consists of 23 items with 9 statements (3, 5, 7, 10, 13, 15, 17, 20, and 21) from the scale are negatively stated and reversely scored. Factor analysis of the scale yielded four factors. Factor I consist of 5 statements (1, 4, 7, 10, and 13) describing anger. Factor II consisting of 5 statements (2, 5, 8, 11, and 15) that measure anxiety. Factor III, consisting of 5 statements (3, 6, 9, 12, and 14) is related to sadness, and finally 8 statements measure impairment.

Risk Perception Scale:

时间窗: 2 weeks

The scale was adapted from van der Linden (2015) who based his measurements on previous work by Bord et al. (2000) and Leiserowitz (2006). It was translated into Arabic language by Elshirbiny (2018) and proved to be valid. The scale comprises 8 statements. In the first question respondents were asked to rate how likely they thought it was that they would personally experience serious threats to their wellbeing. The second question asked how likely it was that climate change would have harmful long-term impacts on society. The two questions used a 7-point scale ranging from very unlikely (1) to very likely (7). The following four questions asked the respondents to rate how serious a threat climate change was to the natural environment, how serious the current impacts of climate change around the world were, and how serious the threat of climate change was to them personally and to Egypt. A 7-point scale was used ranging from not serious at all (1) to very serious (7).

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mahmoud Khedr

Lecturer

Alexandria University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验