Effects of Scapular Stabilization Versus Thoracic Spine Extension Exercises on Pain, Disability and Range Of Motion in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 34
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
研究概览
简要总结
Mechanical neck pain is posteriorly occurring non-specific pain that originates from the superior nuchal line and extends to the first thoracic vertebrae. It is exacerbated by sustained neck postures, neck movements or cervical muscle palpation. The aim of study will be to compare the effects of scapular stabilization versus thoracic spine extension exercises on pain, disability and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain.
详细描述
A Randomized Clinical Trial will be conducted at Riphah Clinic Lahore, FMH Physiotherapy Clinic and Boston Physiotherapy Clinic Lahore through consecutive sampling technique on 30 patients which will be allocated using simple random sampling through sealed opaque enveloped into Group A and Group B. Group A will be treated with scapular stabilization exercises and Group B will be treated with thoracic extension exercises at the frequency of 2 sets with 10 repetitions and thrice a week. Outcome measures will be conducted through pain, disability and range of motion questionnaire after 6 weeks. Data will be analyzed during SPSS software version 21. After assessing normality of data by Shapiro-Wilk test, it will be decided either parametric or non-parametric test will be used within a group or between two groups.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 40 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Males and Females between 18 and 40 years of age with mechanical neck pain. (symptoms provoked by neck movement and/or palpation of musculature of the cervical region)
- •Chronic mechanical neck pain for more than 3 months.
排除标准
- •Cervical radiculopathy
- •Traumatic neck injury
- •History of cervical and thoracic spine surgery
- •Neck pain associated with vertigo
- •Osteoporosis
- •Vertebral Fractures
- •Pregnancy
- •Diagnosed psychological disorders
结局指标
主要结局
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
时间窗: follow up at 6th week
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (an outcome measure) that is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity in adults, including those with chronic pain. The NPRS is a segmented numeric version in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of pain. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable"). The NPRS takes \<1 minute to complete The NPRS is a valid and reliable scale to measure pain intensity; * High test-retest reliability has been (r = 0.96 and 0.95, respectively) * For construct validity, the NPRS was shown to be highly correlated: correlations range from 0.86 to 0.95.
Neck Disability index (NDI)
时间窗: follow up at 6th week
This questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how your neck pain has affected your ability to manage in everyday life. Every section is marked in each section only the one box that applies to you. We realise you may consider that two or more statements in any one section relate to you, but please just mark the box that most closely describes your problem. Intended population includes: Chronic neck or upper back pain and musculoskeletal neck pain. Scoring: For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0, if the last statement is marked it = 5. If all ten sections are completed the score is calculated.
Range of Motion
时间窗: follow up at 6th week
A goniometer is an instrument that measures the available range of motion at a joint. To measure the range of motion physical therapists most commonly use a goniometer. It is necessary that a single notation system is used in goniometry. The neutral zero method (0 to 180- degree system) is the most widely used method. The same goniometer should always be used to reduce the chances of instrumental error.
次要结局
未报告次要终点