The Clinical Performance of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations in Patients With Amelogenesis Imperfecta
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 15
- 主要终点
- Number of failed restorations evaluated according to the modified USPSH criteria in patients with occlusal restorations.
研究概览
简要总结
In AI patients, adhesion still remains the first option in order to achieve an early, minimally invasive intervention, and the altered enamel still represents an acceptable substrate for bonding in some AI variants. Many cases have revealed that the direct composite restorations provide satisfactory esthetic and functionality in restoring AI-affected teeth. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of composite restorations in posterior teeth in patients afflicted with Amelogenesis Imperfecta using nanohybrid and nanofill composite materials
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Treatment
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 14 Years 至 30 Years（Child, Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •the patient had to require treatment due to carious lesions in one or more surface of molars and premolars,
- •AI diagnosis had to be made, which had to be verified clinically, and also confirmed by anamnestic family history, or clinical examination concerning Witkop's classification
排除标准
- •patients with developmental enamel defects of other origins such as fluorosis, molar incisor hypomineralization;
- •AI was associated with other oral developmental or systemic disorders, and dental abnormalities such as open-bite, deep-bite, and cross-bite;
- •patients who were unable to provide their informed consent.
研究组 & 干预措施
patients have carious lesions in one or more surface of molars and premolars
patients received direct composite restorations using a nanohybrid and a nonofil composite restorations
干预措施: dental composite (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Number of failed restorations evaluated according to the modified USPSH criteria in patients with occlusal restorations.
时间窗: an average of 1 year
In restorations, retention rate, color match, wear or loss of anatomic form, marginal discoloration, caries, marginal adaptation, and surface texture were scored success or failure according to modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. According to this criteria, success restorations received Alfa (A) or Bravo (B) scores. Alfa (A) represents the ideal clinical situation; Bravo (B) is the clinically acceptable. Failed restorations received Charlie (C) or Delta (D) scores. Charlie (C) is the clinically unacceptable situations where the restorations had to be replaced; Delta (D) is the situation where the restoration is fractured, mobile or missing and needed to be replaced immediately.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Neslihan Tekçe
Associate Professor
Kocaeli University