The Effect of Arteriovenous Fistula Care Training Given to Hemodialysis Patients on Quality of Life, Comfort and Self-Care Behaviours
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 60
- 主要终点
- Evaluation of Self-Care Behaviours Regarding Arteriovenous Fistula in Hemodialysis Patients
研究概览
简要总结
This study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of Arterio-Venous Fistula (AVF) care training given to hamodialysis patients on quality of life, comfort and self-care behaviours. Patient education is one of the practices that help patients to gain self-care behaviours as well as reducing the cost of health expenditures. Nurses are health professionals who play an important role in patient education. Nurses provide patient education by using different materials. These materials can sometimes be mobile phones, videos, web-based applications, sometimes face-to-face interviews with patients, brochures or written materials. In this study, a training programme for AVF care will be developed. In addition, it is expected that the AVF care training to be given to HD patients will increase the quality of life and comfort areas, and increase the awareness and well-being levels of patients in self-care behaviours. The effectiveness of the study will be expanded by presenting the results of the research as a paper in an international comprehensive congress. An article of the study will be published in a journal scanned in international indexes and will be included in the literature.
详细描述
This study will be conducted to determine the effect of Arterio-Venous Fistula (AVF) care training given to haemodialysis patients on quality of life, comfort and self-care behaviours.
The research will be conducted as an experimental, pre-test post-test randomised controlled experimental study.
Hypotheses:
H0: AVF care training given to haemodialysis patients has no effect on patients' quality of life, comfort and self-care behaviours.
H1: AVF care training given to haemodialysis patients affects patients' quality of life.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •-Volunteering to participate in the research,
- •Speaking Turkish.
- •18 years of age or older
- •Having AVF
- •Receiving HD treatment 3 times a week for at least 6 months
- •Not having cognitive and mental problems that prevent participation in the study
排除标准
- •Not consenting to participate in the study
- •Being a diagnosed psychiatric individual,
- •Having a visual, hearing, speech, physical or mental disability,
- •Being incomplete in their education.
结局指标
主要结局
Evaluation of Self-Care Behaviours Regarding Arteriovenous Fistula in Hemodialysis Patients
时间窗: eight weeks
The scale was developed by Sousa et al. to evaluate patients' care behaviors related to arteriovenous fistula and to follow up patients' education. The scale was developed in Portuguese and its validity and reliability for the Turkish society was performed by İkiz and Usta. It is a 16-item, 5-point Likert scale consisting of single-sentence phrases. The scale consists of two sub-dimensions as symptom and "Symptom Management" and "Prevention of Complications". The item numbers of the Symptom and Symptom Management sub-dimension of the scale are 1,3,6,11,13,16 and the item numbers of the Complication Prevention sub-dimension are 2,4,5,7,8,9,10,12,14,15.22. The time required to administer the scale is about 2-3 minutes. While 16 indicates the lowest possible score in the scoring of the scale, 80 indicates the highest score. The lowest possible score from the symptom and symptom management sub-dimension is 6 and the highest score is 30. The lowest score that can be obtained from the sub-d
Comfort Scale for Haemodialysis Patients (HCP)
时间窗: eight weeks
It was revised by Orak et al. (2017) by using the General Comfort Scale developed by Kolcaba (1992) and later comfort scales developed specifically for certain situations. The scale consists of 9 items and 2 sub-dimensions (overcoming and relaxing). The responses given to the 4th item of the 5-point Likert-type scale are scored as "never" 1 point, "very rarely" 2 points, "sometimes" 3 points, "very often" 4 points and "always" 5 points. The scores given to the other items (1-3, 5-9) are scored in reverse: "never" 5 points, "very rarely" 4 points, "sometimes" 3 points, "very often" 2 points and "always" 1 point. The evaluation of the scale is determined by calculating the average score, the lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 1, the highest score is 5. The comfort level increases as the score gets closer to 5. The scale has two sub-dimensions: "Relaxation" (items 7-9) and "Overcoming" (items 1-6).
SF-12 Quality of Life Short Form
时间窗: eight weeks
SF-12 was developed by Ware et al. (1996). The Turkish version of the scale was developed by Soylu and Kütük. The scale is an outcome measure filled out by the patient, evaluating the impact of health on the individual's daily life. SF-12 is basically a shortened version of SF36, consisting of 8 sub-dimensions and a total of 12 items. This scale evaluates physical functioning with 2 items, physical role with 2 items, body pain with 1 item, general health with 1 item, energy with 1 item, social functioning with 1 item, emotional role with 2 items, and mental health with 2 items.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Zümrüt AKGÜN ŞAHİN
Assoc.Prof
Kafkas University