Mechanism of Rumination in the Alleviation of Emotional Distress by Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Evidence from Behavioral Experiments
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 160
- 主要终点
- Changes of Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire during the intervention
研究概览
简要总结
This study hopes to explore whether the changes in rumination exhibited in behavioral experiments mediates the effects of mindfulness intervention on alleviating emotional distress
详细描述
In recent years, mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have seen extensive application in both clinical and non-clinical settings. Studies show that mindfulness training improves emotional regulation and processing, contributing to better emotional health. MBIs have proven effective in reducing anxiety and depression among patients with conditions like multiple sclerosis, enhancing personal well-being, and alleviating chronic pain. Given the mounting evidence supporting its benefits, MBIs have become widely adopted across various settings. Nonetheless, the precise mechanisms through which mindfulness alleviates emotional distress remain poorly understood.
Rumination, a transdiagnostic process, plays a critical role in the development and persistence of emotional distress. Empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of MBIs in reducing rumination. However, the role of rumination in mediating the effects of MBIs on emotional distress remains inconsistent across studies. Kazdin (2007, 2009) outlined criteria for evaluating mechanisms and mediators, yet existing studies lack sufficient evidence to meet these standards. This study aims to explore the mechanistic role of rumination using behavioral experiments, focusing on the consistency criterion
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 55 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •- Subjects with scores greater than 21 on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale.
- •- Aged 18-55 years old.
排除标准
- •- Subjects who could not access the Internet;
- •- Subjects with insufficient Chinese ability;
- •- Subjects who have participated in mindfulness based projects for more than 6 weeks before, and / or the current frequency of meditation practice is more than once a week;
- •- Subjects with schizophrenia or psychotic affective disorder, current organic mental disorder, substance abuse disorder and generalized developmental disorder;
- •- Subjects with high risk of suicide.
结局指标
主要结局
Changes of Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire during the intervention
时间窗: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire is a self-reported questionnaire measuring mindfulness levels. Scores range from 39 to 195, with higher scores indicating higher levels of mindfulness.
Changes of 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale during the intervention
时间窗: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
The 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale is a self-reported questionnaire measuring distress. Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating higher levels of distress.
Changes of Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire during the intervention
时间窗: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire is a self-reported questionnaire measuring Rumination level.Scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher levels of Rumination.
Changes of Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale during the intervention
时间窗: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale is a self-reported questionnaire measuring anxiety. Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety.
Changes of Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale during the intervention
时间窗: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
The Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale is a self-reported questionnaire measuring depression. Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression.
Changes of the Brief State Rumination Inventory during the intervention
时间窗: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
The Brief State Rumination Inventory comprises eight items designed to measure an individual's state rumination tendency at a given moment, encompassing aspects such as the intensity of negative emotions, repetitive thinking, loss of thought control, and the strength of negative affect. The total score, which is derived by summing up the scores of all items, indicates the overall level of the measured construct.
Changes of the momentary repetitive negative thinking during the intervention
时间窗: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
momentary repetitive negative thinking measures the "process" characteristics of rumination, which are traits that exist across diagnostic categories. The scale consists of four items (e.g., "Thoughts come to my mind that I would rather not have"). Each item focuses on a core feature of rumination - repetitiveness, intrusiveness, uncontrollability, and disruptiveness. Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale, where 1 = not at all and 7 = extremely.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Xinghua Liu
Director
Peking University