E4D Compare Adapted to Evaluate Pulpal Access Cavity Preparation in the D2 Preclinical Endodontics Course: Educational Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 59
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Self-assessment - traditional method vs traditional method plus 3D software method
研究概览
简要总结
Based on pilot study's promising results, we decided to further investigate the impact of adapting Planmeca Romexis Compare software to evaluate pulpal access preparations on second-year dental students' technical performance, self-evaluation skills and opinions. No educational records, grades, coursework, or any other assignments that are completed as part of the regular class will be analyzed as part of this study.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Second-year dental students enrolled in DDDS 719 Integrated Practice of Dentistry Lab II during 2022-2023 at Texas A&M School of Dentistry
- •Students who have completed fixed prosthodontics preclinical course
- •Students attending the endodontics preclinical course.
排除标准
- •First, third and fourth-year dental students at Texas A&M School of Dentistry
- •Second-year dental students NOT enrolled in DDDS 719 Integrated Practice of Dentistry Lab II during 2022-2023 at Texas A&M School of Dentistry
- •Students who are not interested in participating.
结局指标
主要结局
Self-assessment - traditional method vs traditional method plus 3D software method
时间窗: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks and 7 weeks
Compare self-assessment after traditional method only and with extra 3D software method
Grading - traditional method vs traditional method plus 3D software method
时间窗: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks and 7 weeks
Compare technical skills after traditional method only and with extra 3D software method
次要结局
- Grading - traditional/visual grading vs 3D software grading(baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks and 7 weeks)