DRKS00022469已完成不适用
3D vs. 2D laparoscopy - effect on postoperative complications and operation time, results of a retrospective observationally study with propensity score matching
Asklepios Klinik Langen0 个研究点目标入组 1,119 人开始时间: 2021年7月13日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 1,119
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 100 Years（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •All patients having a laparoscopic procedure with 3D visualization from 2017 to 2018 and all patients having a laparoscopic procedure with 2D visualization from 2011 to 2015 in our clinic
排除标准
- •Exclusion criteria from the study were intraoperative conversion to laparotomy, postoperative transfer to another hospital , transfer to another department because of the intraoperative findings, intraoperative technical problems withe the used visualization and a minor quantity of performed surgical procedures in the 3D group with no corresponding procedure in the 2D visualization grupe and vice versa.
研究者
相似试验
Unknown
不适用
3-dimensional Versus 2-dimensional Laparoscopy for MyomectomyLaparoscopyNCT04070716Kangbuk Samsung Hospital64
Unknown
不适用
3-dimensional Versus 2-dimensional Laparoscopy for HysterectomyLaparoscopyNCT04070872Kangbuk Samsung Hospital68
已完成
不适用
2D vs. 3D Imaging in laparoscopic surgeryK35.8K80.20Acute appendicitis, other and unspecifiedDRKS00005685Asklepios Klinik Langen79
Unknown
不适用
3D vs 2D-laparoscopy for Rectocele and Rectal Prolapse Correction: a Prospective, Randomized, Single Center StudyRectocele and Complete Uterovaginal ProlapseRectal ProlapseFemale RectoceleRectocele and Incomplete Uterine ProlapseNCT04817150Alexander Khitaryan60
已完成
不适用
Evaluation of 3D Visualization for Total ColectomyUlcerative ColitisNCT02370056The Cleveland Clinic53