Project UPHOLDS: An Optimization Pilot to Optimize An Early Palliative Care Intervention for Advanced Heart Failure

University of Alabama at Birmingham1 个研究点分布在 1 个国家目标入组 64 人开始时间: 2024年8月15日最近更新: 2026年7月2日

适应症

干预措施

试验速览

阶段: 不适用
状态: 进行中（未招募）
发起方: University of Alabama at Birmingham
入组人数: 64
试验地点: 1
主要终点: Feasibility of Intervention Delivery and Data Collection

研究概览研究设计入排标准研究组 & 干预措施结局指标研究者研究点记录与标识符相似试验

研究概览

简要总结

Using a highly innovative methodology, the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), the purpose of this randomized factorial pilot trial is to identify feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of components of an intervention (UPHOLDS) to improve quality of life of older adults with advancing heart failure. Using a 2x2x2x2 factorial design, 64 adults with advancing heart failure will be randomized to receive one or more palliative care coach-delivered components, based on Ferrans' Health-Related Quality of Life Model: 1) psychoeducation on palliative care principles (4 vs. 8 sessions); 2) financial coaching (yes vs. no); 3) one-time specialty outpatient palliative care consultation (yes vs. no); and monthly follow (1 monthly follow-up call vs. monthly follow-up calls for 24 weeks).

详细描述

A priority NINR, nursing, and palliative care focus is how to best support patients with advanced AHA Stage C/D heart failure (HF). HF, a progressive condition, affecting 6.2 million U.S. adults results in reduced quality of life (QOL), high symptom burden, and unpredictable disease trajectory.There is a critical need to develop effective and scalable early palliative care (PC) interventions for patients with advanced HF, especially in the Southeastern U.S., where there is a high proportion of underserved groups (e.g., African-Americans, rural dwellers) who experience high HF morbidity and mortality.However, few interventions have been tested and demonstrated effectiveness- and none have been widely translated to practice.

Recent major systematic reviews and research agendas identify developing efficacious and scalable HF PC interventions as a key research priority. However, these efforts are stymied by a lack of understanding "active" PC interventions components. Traditional RCTs treat interventions as "bundled" packages, making it hard to assess definitively which intervention components are most essential for efficacy and efficiency. Hence, innovative methods are needed to efficiently test multiple intervention components simultaneously. To address this problem, prior work has developed and refined intervention components for underresourced Southern older adults with advanced HF (Utilizing Palliative Care for Heart Failure Optimized using Lay Navigators to Decrease Suffering -Project UPHOLDS).

Based on Ferrans' Health-Related QOL Model, we will use the highly innovative Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST)1 strategy to pilot test via a factorial design the individual UPHOLDS components with underresourced, older adults with advancing HF (n=64) who will be randomized to receive different levels of the following UPHOLDS intervention components: 1) outpatient PC consultation (Yes vs. No), 2) lay navigator PC coaching sessions addressing self-care, symptom management, communication, problem solving, decision-making, and advance care planning (4 vs. 8 weekly telephone sessions), 3) financial coaching session addressing financial distress and resources (Yes vs. No) and 4) monthly maintenance follow-up phone calls (1 vs. 4 calls).

Aim 1: Using the innovative MOST factorial design, determine UPHOLDS feasibility, acceptability, enrollment, retention, and completion rates in participants (n=64) for 24 weeks. Feasibility: >80% of participants will be enrolled, retained, and will complete all measures and all intervention components. Acceptability: Positive post-intervention interviews.

Aim 2: Explore the preliminary efficacy of individual intervention components and component interaction on patient outcomes at 12- and 24- weeks after baseline including a) QOL using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Scale (primary outcome) b) financial toxicity using the Comprehensive score for financial toxicity, and c) mood using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

研究设计

研究类型: Interventional
分配方式: Randomized
干预模型: Factorial
主要目的: Supportive Care
盲法: Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Data collectors and principal investigator will be blind to participant condition; participants will be instructed NOT to discuss their assignment with data collectors. Trials participants will know their intervention condition as will the palliative care coach involved in delivering the intervention.

入排标准

年龄范围: 50 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
性别: All
接受健康志愿者: 是

入选标准

•1) Age ≥50 years; 2) Living with heart failure, defined as New York Heart Association Class II-IV or American Heart Association Stage C/D OR Recent hospitalization with primary diagnosis of acute, decompensated heart failure (discharged < last 6 months); 3) English speaking; 4) Willingness to participate in intervention and complete data collection calls; 5) Telephone access.

排除标准

•1) Self-reported severe mental illness (i.e., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder), dementia, active suicidal ideation, or active substance abuse; 2) LVAD placement; 3) Non-cardiac terminal illness; 4) Previous palliative care consultation; 5) Receiving hospice

研究组 & 干预措施

Basic palliative care coaching + outpatient visit + 4 monthly follow-up calls

Experimental

4 telehealth sessions on principles of problem solving, self-care, symptom management, and advanced care planning, one-time Comprehensive Specialty Outpatient Palliative Care Clinic guided by the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care Guidelines, and monthly follow-up calls for 4 months