跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2019/04/018786
CTRI/2019/04/018786尚未招募4 期

Comparative study of efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness of topical combination therapy with clindamycin 1% - benzoyl peroxide 2.5% versus adapalene 0.1% - benzoyl peroxide 2.5% in cases of mild to moderate facial acne vulgaris: A prospective, randomized, open label, parallel study

Government medical college Nagpur0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
尚未招募

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

入选标准

  • 1) Subjects of either gender
  • 2) Subjects of 12 to 35 years of age with mild to moderate (comedones, papules and few pustules) facial acne vulgaris having more than or equal to 2 and less than equal to 30 lesions(inflammatory and/or non inflammatory) lesions

排除标准

  • 1)Patients already on anti-acne medication in last one month
  • 2) Patients having nodulocystic lesions, acne conglobata, acne fulminans, secondary acne
  • 3) Patients unwilling to give written informed consent
  • 4) Patients with known hypersensitivity to benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin or adapalene
  • 5) Pregnant or lactating women

研究者

相似试验

Comparison of clindamycin - benzoyl peroxide versus... | 临床试验