跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05604625
NCT05604625Enrolling By Invitation不适用

A Comparison of Class Ⅱ Malocclusion Treatment Using Van Beek-headgear Activator Versus Andresen Activator: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Al-Azhar University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 24 人开始时间: 2022年12月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
Enrolling By Invitation
入组人数
24
试验地点
2
主要终点
treating Class II division 1 malocclusion

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of this study is to compare the treatment results when treating Class II division 1 malocclusion using the Van Beek-Headgear Activator combination (vBHGA) appliance versus using the Andresen activator.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
8 Years 至 13 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Class II division 1 indicated by ANB angle value ≥ 4º
  • Class II division 1 with overjet > 5mm.
  • An age range between 8 and 13 years growing patient using cervical vertebral stage assessment (CVS).
  • No previous orthodontic treatment
  • No indications or symptoms of periodontal disease in the past or present, as determined by clinical and radiographic examination

排除标准

  • Missing teeth (excluding 3rd molars).
  • Craniofacial anomalies.
  • Medical condition or prescription medication that may affect growth.
  • Lack of compliance whenever documented in the charts.

结局指标

主要结局

treating Class II division 1 malocclusion

时间窗: at 8 months

rate of mandibular and maxillary growth

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ahmed Essam Eldein Saad Hamed Shady

doctor

Al-Azhar University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Ethically Accepted With Code 851/2971 A Comparison... | 临床试验