A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Evaluating Lung Injury, Long-term Clinical Outcomes, and Environmental Impact of Tubeless Versus Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer Resection

Minimally invasive thoracic surgery typically relies on general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, practices associated with increased anesthetic exposure, ventilator-induced lung injury, and environmental burden due to anesthetic gas emissions. To address these issues, our research group developed the tubeless VATS technique, employing spontaneous ventilation under monitored anesthesia care with supraglottic airway devices, nerve blocks, and minimal use of opioids and volatile anesthetics.

This multicenter study prospectively enrolls patients undergoing elective lung cancer resection via either tubeless or conventional intubated VATS, following a standardized protocol. The primary objectives include assessing the incidence and severity of lung injury using mechanical power metrics derived from a validated machine-learning model, quantifying anesthetic drug usage, evaluating postoperative recovery and complication rates, and analyzing long-term clinical outcomes including overall survival and quality of life measures.

Additionally, the study investigates the environmental impact of each anesthesia method by quantifying reductions in carbon emissions associated with decreased consumption of inhalational anesthetics. Findings from this research could significantly influence clinical practice guidelines by demonstrating the benefits of tubeless VATS in enhancing patient safety, improving long-term clinical outcomes, and advancing sustainable surgical practices.