跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04587674
NCT04587674已完成不适用

Identification of Outcome Predictors and Stratification of Responder Profiles Implanted With Spinal Cord Stimulation. An AI-based-pathway & Algorithmic Approach to Treat Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients

Poitiers University Hospital14 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 110 人开始时间: 2021年4月19日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
110
试验地点
14
主要终点
Composite SCS efficacy score

研究概览

简要总结

Failed Back Surgery Syndrome is commonly defined as new, recurrent, or persistent pain in the back and/or leg(s) of at least 6-month duration following spinal surgery. The literature estimates that 10-50% of patients undergoing spinal surgery are likely to develop such pain, representing a substantial financial burden. Among them, 5-10% would suffer from severe pain, which are intense, neuropathic and generally refractory to conventional therapeutic strategies considerably affect patients' functional capacity as well as their psychological and social well-being.

Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is a well-established therapy to alleviate severe intractable neuropathic pain such as FBSS. SCS is a safe and reversible treatment option, which leads to improvement in pain relief and quality of life for patients with FBSS. Despite encouraging results in a chronic painful patient population that is refractory to conventional therapies, the literature estimates that only 58% [53% - 64%] of patients implanted with SCS devices achieved adequate pain relief.

FBSS population characterization and stratification and predictive modeling of SCS outcome are thus crucial to delineate future treatment options and to deliver neuromodulation therapy to the right patient.

The investigators designed a clinical prospective project based on SCS outcome optimization and SCS candidates' stratification: PREDIBACK 2.

This study would be a following part of a continuous project (PREDIBACK) that aims to better understand and stratify the therapies (drugs, surgery, psychological therapy or SCS) proposed to FBSS patients. The goal of PREDIBACK 1 was to develop a decision tool that simplifies the therapeutic decision process.

PREDIBACK 2 will focus on the neuromodulation pathway. Easing and helping patient orientation should improve referral yielding to specialists and accelerate patient flow through care pathway. Hence, facilitating access to adequate therapies for FBSS patients who usually have a longstanding history of pain.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Screening
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Composite SCS efficacy score

时间窗: 6 months

Rate of SCS responders is defined as having at least three of these criteria: * Having at least a 30% decrease in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) percentage. 10 items ranging from 0 to 5 where 0 indicates high ability and 5 indicate the inability. * Having at least a 50% decrease in the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) (0 = no back pain, 10=worst imaginable pain) * Having at least a 0.2 points increase in the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire score. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best possible quality of life. * Having a decrease of 1.4 points in the Hospital Anxiety-Depression Scale (HADS) score. The total score ranges from 0 to 24 for each category. * 30% decrease pain surface (cm²): pain will assess painful area in terms of intensity, surface and pain typology. * Having a Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score of at least 6. PGIC is a 7-point scale. * Drug intake will be measured using the Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) with a reduction of 3.4 points.

次要结局

  • Functional capacity(6 months)
  • Impact of Quality of life(6 months)
  • Psychological distress(6 months)
  • Psychological resilience(6 months)
  • Pain intensity(6 months)
  • Pain surface(6 months)
  • Social insecurity(6 months)
  • Effects of the technical parameters and Spinal Cord Stimulation devices on paresthesia(6 months)
  • Spinal Cord Stimulation efficacy using objective measurement tools(6 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (14)

Loading locations...

相似试验