跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01249625
NCT01249625已完成不适用

Incidence of Respiratory Illness in Outpatient Healthcare Workers Who Wear Respirators or Medical Masks While Caring for Patients

Johns Hopkins University13 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 2,862 人开始时间: 2010年12月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
2,862
试验地点
13
主要终点
Protective Effects of N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks (MM) as Assessed by Number of Influenza A and B Events

研究概览

简要总结

Despite widespread use of respiratory protective equipment in the U.S. healthcare workplace, there is very little clinical evidence that respirators prevent healthcare personnel (HCP) from airborne infectious diseases. Scientific investigation of this issue has been quite complicated, primarily because the use of respirators has become "the standard of care" for protection against airborne diseases in some instances, even without sufficient evidence to support their use. The key question remains: How well do respirators prevent airborne infectious diseases? The answer to this important question has important medical, public health, political and economic implications.

详细描述

Prevention strategies are key in limiting the transmission of respiratory viruses such as influenza. Among non-pharmacologic interventions, there is intense interest in the use of facial protective equipment (FPE) - medical masks (MM) or N95 respirators (N95) - as a key component of personal protective equipment (PPE) when faced with respiratory illness including influenza. However, their relative protective effect is unknown, especially in the outpatient setting (OPD). To plan for future epidemics and best manage limited supplies of FPE, evidence is needed to guide planning activities and policy makers. This project aims to answer a key question: How do N95s protect healthcare workers (HCWs) in the OPD against influenza, influenza-like illness (ILI), acute respiratory illness (ARI) and other causes of respiratory illnesses including respiratory viral illness (RV), as compared to MMs? The study outcomes are to:

  • determine the most effective FPE equipment to use to prevent disease transmission in the OPD during an influenza outbreak, epidemic or pandemic event.
  • the incidence of organism-specific rates of ARI in the OPD during the RV season.
  • the incidence rate of organism-specific respiratory viral infections in the OPD.

Clinics (or their functional partitions) will be randomized into either the N95 or MM arm using a stratified randomization scheme to ensure comparability between the two arms. All participants, regardless of study arm, will be fit-tested for an N95. The study will require a 16-18 week period that will be initiated when viral surveillance data indicates that influenza season has begun. Participants will be recruited through informational meetings with clinic staff. Participants will have blood drawn before week 1 and after the end of the active portion of the study to assess seroconversion over the study period to capture the incidence of non-symptomatic influenza. All participants will fill out a pre-study survey and post on knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding influenza, influenza vaccinations, and appropriate PPE.

During the first week, participants will fill out a form with basic demographic and workplace information. Participants will be asked to 1. wear participant's appropriate FPE when in close contact with patients with suspected or confirmed influenza or RV for the next 12-16 weeks; 2. fill out a daily form assessing exposure to ILI and FPE use, and weekly forms assessing RV symptoms and medication use. The investigators will collect nasal and throat (pharyngeal) swabs twice during the study for all participants, and when participants report having an ILI or ARI. Study staff will make unannounced visits to the clinics to observe FPE and hand hygiene compliance rates.

Participants will be compensated for participation (as detailed below). To be included the clinical site leadership has agreed to have one of more participants in the trial. To be included the subject(s): (1) meets the definition of "healthcare personnel" (2) is able to read and sign informed consent (3) agrees to all requirements of the protocol, including fit testing and diary keeping (4) is 18 years old or greater (6) passes fit testing for one of the study supplied N95 and agrees to use that model for the entire 16 week period of the study. Subjects are excluded if: (1) subject self-identified as having severe heart, lung, neurological or other systemic disease that one or more Investigator believes could preclude safe participation (2) are known to not tolerate wearing FPE for any period (3) facial hair, or other issue such as facial adornments, preclude respirator Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)-compliant fit testing or proper mask fit during the study period (4) subjects are advised by Occupational Health (or other qualified clinician) to not wear the same or similar respirator or medical mask models used in this study (5) in the opinion of the Investigator, may not be able to reasonably participate in the trial for any reason (6) Self-identified as in, or will be in the third trimester of pregnancy, during the study period.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 100 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Clinical site leadership has agreed to have one or more staff participate in the trial
  • Subject meets the definition of "healthcare personnel"
  • Subject able to read and sign informed consent
  • Subject agrees to all requirements of the protocol, including fit testing and diary keeping
  • Subject's age is 18 or greater
  • Subject passes fit testing for one of the study supplied respirator models and agrees to use that model for the entire intervention period of the study (if in respirator arm).

排除标准

  • Subject self-identified as having severe heart, lung, neurological or other systemic disease that one or more Investigator believes could preclude safe participation
  • Known to not tolerate wearing respiratory protective equipment for any period
  • Facial hair, or other issue such as facial adornments, precluding respirator OSHA-compliant fit testing or proper mask fit during the study period
  • Advised by Occupational Health (or other qualified clinician) to not wear the same or similar respirator or medical mask models used in this study
  • In the opinion of the Investigator, may not be able to reasonably participate in the trial for any reason
  • Self-identified as in, or will be in the third trimester of pregnancy, during the study period.
  • Subject rotating in 2 different ResPECT study clinic sites /clusters during the 12-week study period.
  • Subject works less than 75% of the intervention period in that clinic.
  • Subject is a previous participant of the ResPECT Study, but does not consent for data from previous flu season(s) to be linked.

研究组 & 干预措施

N95 Respirator

Active Comparator

The investigators are comparing specific N95 respirator against specific medical masks.

干预措施: N95 Respirator (Device)

Medical/surgical mask

Active Comparator

The investigators are comparing medical/surgical masks against the N95 respirator.

干预措施: Medical/surgical mask (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Protective Effects of N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks (MM) as Assessed by Number of Influenza A and B Events

时间窗: 60 weeks

Number of influenza A and B events in healthcare practitioners wearing N95 respirators compared to medical masks.

次要结局

  • Protective Effects of N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks as Assessed by Number of Influenza-like Illnesses(60 weeks)
  • Protective Effects of N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks as Assessed by Number of Lab Detected Respiratory Infections(60 weeks)
  • Protective Effects of N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks as Assessed by Number of Laboratory Confirmed Illness(60 weeks)
  • Protective Effects of N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks as Assessed by Number of Lab Confirmed Respiratory Illnesses(60 weeks)
  • Protective Effects of N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks as Assessed by Number of Acute Respiratory Illnesses(60 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (13)

Loading locations...

相似试验

The Respiratory Protection Effectiveness Clinical... | 临床试验