跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01297790
NCT01297790已完成不适用

Cough Responses to Tussive Agents in Health and Disease

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 102 人开始时间: 2009年11月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
102
试验地点
1
主要终点
Objective cough recording

研究概览

简要总结

The sensitivity of a persons cough reflex can be measured by getting them to breath in (inhale) irritant chemicals. The purpose of this clinical research study is to test the sensitivity of the cough reflex to a variety of chemicals that can be inhaled to see if coughing responses are different between healthy people and people with respiratory problems that make them cough.

详细描述

Coughing is a distressing symptom which has a major impact on quality of life. It has been estimated that cough costs the UK economy £1 billion each year. Currently there are no effective anti-tussive agents to treat subjects with cough. Although drugs such as morphine may have some anti-tussive effect, side effects unacceptable.

Currently our understanding of the mechanisms which lead to coughing in different diseases is poor. Many mechanistic studies rely on testing the sensitivity of the cough reflex by inhalation of capsaicin (chilli-pepper extract) or citric acid. These challenges do not differentiate well between health and disease or between different disease states. Other agents such as prostaglandins and bradykinin are known to stimulate a coughing but responses to these agents have rarely been used as a measure of cough reflex sensitivity and not been compared to standard challenges.

It is clear that patients with common airway diseases such as COPD and asthma cough significantly more than healthy subjects. Moreover subjects presenting with chronic cough have cough rates an order of magnitude higher than most patients with airway disease. These differences are poorly represented by the differences in current cough challenge tests.

The investigators hypothesize that patterns of cough responses to different tussive agent may better differentiate between health and different disease states. These patterns may also suggest the different mechanisms leading to cough in different diseases.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adult subjects aged 18 years and over
  • Meet criteria for subject groups as outlined below
  • (1) Healthy volunteers
  • Non-smokers
  • No history of respiratory disease
  • (2) Healthy smokers
  • Current smokers with smoking history of ≥10 pack years
  • Spirometry within normal limits i.e. FEV1>80% predicted and FEV1/FVC ratio >75% predicted
  • Physician diagnosis of asthma
  • Airways hyperresponsiveness to methacholine; PC20<16mg/ml (within last 2 years)
  • Non-smokers or ex-smoker with smoking history of ≤10 pack years
  • Physician diagnosis of COPD
  • Ex-smokers with smoking history of ≥20 pack years
  • Spirometry demonstrating airflow obstruction i.e. FEV1/FVC ratio <70%
  • (5) Chronic Cough
  • History of a dry cough for >8 weeks
  • Normal CXR
  • Non-smokers or ex-smoker with smoking history of ≤10 pack years

排除标准

  • Symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection within the last 6 weeks 2) Participation in another clinical trial of an investigational drug within the last 4 weeks 3) Use of medication likely to alter cough reflex sensitivity i.e. ACE inhibitors, codeine phosphate, morphine sulphate, 4) Patients with severe respiratory disease i.e. FEV1 < 1 litre, 5) Significant medical co-morbidities likely to affect ability to participate in the trial or affect cough reflex sensitivity e.g. diabetes, stroke, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis etc.

结局指标

主要结局

Objective cough recording

时间窗: 24 Hours

To perform ambulatory cough recording over 24 hours to assess if there are any differences

Cough response to tussive agents

时间窗: 45 minutes

To measure cough responses to capsaicin, citric acid, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and Bradykinin (BK) in healthy volunteers, airway diseases (asthma and COPD) and chronic cough. To compare the ability of individual challenges and patterns of challenge response to discriminate between diagnostic groups.

次要结局

  • C2 to inhaled tussive agents(45 minutes)

研究者

申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验