An Evaluation of Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews for People With Learning Disabilities and Autistic People (CECILIA)
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 695
- 主要终点
- Experiences of all stakeholders, including people with learning disabilities and autistic people and their families, when taking part in C(E)TRs
研究概览
简要总结
Aims In this research project, we will determine whether Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews are helpful for people with learning disabilities and autistic people and their families.
Background Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews were started in 2014 to help get autistic people and people with learning disabilities out of psychiatric hospitals and to prevent their admission to psychiatric hospitals. Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews involve an independent panel including an Expert by Experience, a clinician, and a commissioner who is responsible for paying for an individual's care. The autistic person or the person with learning disability and their family also attend the meeting. The focus of a Care (Education) and Treatment Review is to either prevent a person from being admitted to a psychiatric hospital in the first place, or to help someone who is already in hospital, get out. They do this by trying to work out ways to overcome barriers that might be stopping someone from leaving hospital. However, we do not know if Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews stop people from being admitted to a psychiatric hospital in the first place, or help people already in hospital get out.
Method Our project has four stages. In Stage 1 we will work with the members of our Lived Experience Advisory Panels to co-produce survey questions. We will design surveys for people with learning disabilities and autistic people, families and carers, Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews panel members, and health and social care professionals to complete. We will share these surveys with as many people as we can nationally. We will make adjustments so that people with learning disabilities can take part in our surveys. We know that individuals with moderate to severe learning disabilities and younger children will not be able to complete the surveys and so we will use other ways to gather their views and experiences. We will also try to work out how much it costs to have a Care (Education) and Treatment Review .
Within Stage 2, we will find out how patients in hospital are doing over time, by attending Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews, CPA, and other patient meetings. We will ask people, including people with moderate and severe learning disabilities to take part in some interviews with us, ensuring we adapt the interview process, so it is accessible. We will use the information from these interviews to work out whether Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews are helping people and making things better.
In Stage 3, we will look at the anonymous data that is collected by the NHS about everyone with a learning disability or autism who is admitted to hospital. We will work out what sorts of things helped them and what sorts of things did not help them get out of hospital. We think we will have data that covers over 11 years.
Within our final stage, Stage 4, we will bring together all of the information we have collected from the different stages of the research to work out what it tells us. We will use the information along with input from our Lived Experience Advisory Panel members to co-produce and share reports and information about what we have found out. We will also co- develop and publish good practice guidance for doing Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews and make sure our guidance is shared in different ways and to different people who need it.
Patient/public involvement We have partnered with Learning Disability England, the National Autistic Society, and the Challenging Behaviour Foundation who will each lead one of our three Lived Experience Advisory Panels: (1) people with learning disabilities, (2) autistic people, and (3) carers and family members. We will have regular meetings with each Lived Experience Advisory Panel to make sure we they can provide input throughout the study. They will help us to design the surveys and interviews, interpret our findings, share the findings and co-produce and publish our good practice guidance in different formats for different target audiences. Each advisory panel will meet separately but we will bring them together once a year to benefit from their combined input.
Our project has been developed collaboratively with Learning Disability England, the National Autistic Society, and the Challenging Behaviour Foundation who all have experience of being involved within Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews. Learning Disability England, the National Autistic Society, and the Challenging Behaviour Foundation will be core members of our study management and study steering committees. Further, a nurse with significant learning disability and autism experience, Expert-by-Experience, and Care (Education) and Treatment Review panel chair is a co-researcher. A carer of a man with severe learning disability is also a co-researcher.
详细描述
Aim To undertake an evaluation of C(E)TRs using mixed methods across four stages with five work packages with children and adults with learning disabilities and autistic children and adults across a range of inpatient settings, including those in the community who receive a C(E)TR who are at risk of admission
Objectives
- To understand the experiences of all stakeholders, including people with learning disabilities and autistic people and their families, when taking part in C(E)TRs including descriptions of the barriers and facilitators to genuine participation and the use of augmentative and alternative communication, and options for improvement.
- To understand how C(E)TRs are being carried out in practice with a range of people with learning disabilities and autistic people across different settings, including those at risk of admission who are in the community.
- To understand how C(E)TRs may be changing care pathways, improving outcomes, potentially preventing admission or promoting discharge, their possible cost implications, and how this is different from existing methods for reviewing care, and to make recommendations for improvement.
- To publish good practice guidance inclusive of practical resources and tools for conducting C(E)TRs and outcome implementation, including how to promote inclusion and participation for people with learning disabilities and autistic people
Research questions
- What are the experiences of people with learning disabilities and autistic people, families, C(E)TR panel members and a range of health and social care professionals when taking part in C(E)TRs?
- How are experts by experience being included and supported to take part in C(E)TRs? What are the barriers and facilitators to participation and how can their participation be promoted?
- How are C(E)TRs being carried out in practice with different groups (e.g., children, adults, autistic adults without learning disabilities) and in different settings (e.g., assessment and treatment units, secure units, acute mental health wards, inpatient units for children)?
- What impact do C(E)TRs have upon care-pathways, and how are recommendations and outcomes implemented and monitored?
- What barriers and facilitators to discharge are identified by C(E)TRs and how are they overcome or addressed by care teams?
- How are C(E)TRs different, similar to, or integrated with existing methods for reviewing care (e.g., Care Programme Approach, Child Protection Conferences, Extraordinary Care Review Meetings)?
- How are C(E)TRs structured and managed to support inclusion, and what adjustments and supports aid participation (e.g., augmentative and alternative communication) of people with learning disabilities and autistic people, and how can these be improved?
- Is there evidence that people with learning disabilities and autistic people who are receiving a C(E)TR are being empowered as a consequence of C(E)TRs? What are the barriers and facilitators to empowerment and how can this be promoted?
- Is there a relationship between the skill mix of a C(E)TR panel and the recommendations or outcomes made and are they implemented and how?
- Are C(E)TRs associated with reducing inpatient numbers and what effect do they have on costs?
- What are likely resource implications of C(E)TR and how might they differ between different types of individuals?
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Other
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 5 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Experiences of all stakeholders, including people with learning disabilities and autistic people and their families, when taking part in C(E)TRs
时间窗: National surveys will be open for 8 months from their launch; data collection for case studies and associated semi-structed interviews will open for 15 months from the point of recruitment.
Data will be gathered through national surveys; attendance at C(E)TRs, and CPA meetings to track individual progress over time, the collection of naturalistic data from the meetings, and though semi-structured interviews with attendees; and anonymised data available from NHS Digital for children and adults.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
