Clinical Study to Improve the Quality of Care in Critically Ill Patients With Suspected Sepsis Through Early Molecular Diagnosis .
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 120
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To determine the ability of SeptiCyte® for the molecular diagnosis of sepsis in critically ill patients with unclear infectious focus.
研究概览
简要总结
Single-center, retrospective observational study to evaluate the implementation of early molecular diagnosis of sepsis using SeptiCyte and BCID2 in 120 critically ill patients with suspected sepsis without clear focus and requiring antimicrobial treatment.
The main objective is to evaluate the performance of these molecular techniques with respect to routine clinical practice and their impact on the optimization of antimicrobial treatment in this group of patients.
详细描述
Background Sepsis has recently been redefined (Sepsis 3) as an infection leading to organ dysfunction (1). Although this definition is not generally accepted by all researchers (2,3) due to the potential for delayed diagnosis, mortality related to this entity could be significantly reduced by early adoption of diagnostic protocols and appropriate and early use of antimicrobial therapy (ATB).
A recent study in Catalonia (4) showed an incidence of 212 cases of sepsis per 100,000 inhabitants/year with a hospital mortality of 21%, which is significantly higher if consider ICU patients (40%) or those affected by septic shock (>50%) (5,6). These data highlight the current importance of this entity and highlight the need to seek new alternatives for early and appropriate diagnosis and treatment to have a favourable impact on the high mortality rate.
Ineffective treatment of sepsis is often due to late diagnosis of sepsis, due to the inherent complication of nonspecific clinical signs. Although procalcitonin (PCT) appears to be an adequate biomarker for the diagnosis of bacterial infection (7,8), different studies show a discrimination of only around 80% (7,8) and recent international guidelines do not recommend its use (9,10,11). These same guidelines recommend the use of scores, such as SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) and qSOFA (a simplified version) based on the presence of altered consciousness, hypotension, and tachypnoea) for early risk stratification of patients suspected of infection.
However, sepsis and non-sepsis systemic inflammatory syndromes present as clinically similar entities, and both are frequently complicated by the appearance of organ dysfunction. Therefore, the identification of sepsis remains subjective and possibly leads to overdiagnosis of sepsis and consequently a high use of ATB in patients who do not have sepsis and who do not benefit from this treatment (12).
The availability of new molecular techniques and the automation of these laboratory analyses have stimulated the search for biomarkers related to the host response to sepsis. Analysis of host gene expression through RNA transcripts (transcriptomics) offers an opportunity in this complex setting of the critically ill patient. Host gene expression differs greatly between septic patients and healthy individuals (13). However, although gene expression between septic and non-septic inflamed patients overlaps to a large extent, several differences between transcripts observed in sepsis can help distinguish infection from other causes of inflammation [14]. The SeptiCyte™ LAB transcription assay was developed to diagnose infection in critically ill patients with suspected sepsis [15]. It is the first host response assay based on quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) methods to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). SeptiCyte™ LAB allows the assessment of host response to infection by measuring the expression of specific genes involved in immune function and inflammatory signaling in whole blood. The first clinical performance study of SeptiCyte™ LAB analyzed 345 patients who were enrolled as part of the Molecular Diagnosis and Sepsis Risk Stratification (MARS) cohort in two ICUs in the Netherlands [15]. Patients were categorized as having sepsis based on a post-hoc medical assessment of the available clinical, radiological, and microbiological evidence [16] resulting in estimates for the AUC (0.77 to 0.99), sensitivity (79% to 100%) and specificity (33% to 91%) varied widely, depending on the prevalence of sepsis, the confidence level with respect to the reference diagnosis and whether patient registration was consecutive. As this analysis took about 6 hours, an early sepsis diagnostic tool (SeptiCyte RAPID (17) has been developed that is based on the measurement of two of the four gene expression biomarkers in peripheral blood (PLAC8 and PLA2G7) using the same quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and correlates closely with the clinical results of SeptiCyte LAB, but with a much simpler workflow. Based on the results, the device issues a report with a sepsis probability scale. (see attached algorithm) This new analysis methodology, together with the usual biomarkers, can improve the early diagnosis of sepsis, differentiate between inflamed and septic patients.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Other
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 15 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age (>15 years old)
- •At least 2 SIRS criteria
- •RCP (> 10 mg/dL) or PCT (> 0.5 ng/mL in community or > 1.0ng/mL in nosocomial infection) elevated
- •3.- Without a clear focus that justifies sepsis 4.- High suspicion of infection that requires starting antimicrobial treatment.
排除标准
- •Failure to obtain the samples within 12 hours after the infection is suspected and antibiotic administration
- •Previous administration of antimicrobials in the last 24 hours
- •Documented or evident sepsis focus on ICU admission
结局指标
主要结局
To determine the ability of SeptiCyte® for the molecular diagnosis of sepsis in critically ill patients with unclear infectious focus.
时间窗: Observational period from the time of suspected sepsis (defined as the time of blood culture) until resolution of the probable sepsis (usually 7-10 days). Only the first episode of suspected sepsis will be considered for each patient.
The number of patients classified as having a high, intermediate or no possibility of sepsis with respect to the same classification made on the basis of clinical and laboratory criteria by 3 physicians with expertise in infections at the time of resolution of the suspected sepsis.
To determine the ability of filmarryas BCID 2® for the early identification of microorganisms in BC with a few hours of incubation and before they have become positive
时间窗: Observational period from blood culture collection to 7 days of incubation (period of completion of blood culture incubation when negative results are reported as definitive).
The number of microorganisms identified by BCID2 after 6-8 hours of incubation with respect to the number of microorganisms identified by blood culture (gold standard).
次要结局
- To determine the possible impact of the results on the management (optimization) of antimicrobial treatment.(Observational period from the time of suspected sepsis (defined as the time of blood culture) until resolution of the probable sepsis (usually 7-10 days).)
研究者
Alejandro Rodriguez Oviedo , MD
MD,PhD,MSc
Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.
