The All-comers Sirolimus-coated Balloon European Registry
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 2,123
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Target lesion revascularization
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to observe and evaluate the performance of a Sirolimus-eluting Drug Coated Balloon for the treatment of any type of coronary lesions, including native vessel disease and in stent restenosis.
详细描述
The drug coated balloons (DCB) are one of the most promising innovations in the interventional cardiology field, and in some cases represent a valid alternative to stents. The numerous devices currently on the market, and the clinical results sometimes encouraging, sometimes less, have clearly shown that there is no "class" effect. The DCB so far available were conformed to elute only paclitaxel, an high lipophilicity drug with a narrow therapeutic window, cytotoxic at medium-high dosage.
The DCB allow the drug release without needing to implant prostheses in the coronary vessel; such prostheses (stents have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events, even years after implantation, caused by a non- healing of the vessel by the action of the drug itself or of the polymer, together with the presence of the metal of the stent . After a DCP angioplasty the absence of such implants, instead, ensures a quick recovery of the vessel function. Moreover, the absence of the prosthesis is particularly favorable in the case of small/medium diameter vessels, tortuous or severe calcific vessel, or for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.
In the Bello study, the DCB IN.PACT Falcon, has reached the non-inferiority expected (and also the superiority, not expected), against the same DES regarding the primary endpoint of late lumen loss (LLL) at the angiographic control. The results of this study, encouraging for the drug-eluting balloon technology, however, are tainted by a now obsolete technology, the use of an endpoint that supports the balloon (LLL), and the comparison with a DES that is no longer in trade and is objectively inferior to those used in 2016.
Several new generation DCB have been developed in the last years, with the aim of improving the paclitaxel release in the coronary wall, thus reducing the risk of restenosis. In addition, several improvements have involved the trackability and deliverability of these devices even in tortuous and small vessels . The latest generation DCB have several advantages compared to the old generation DCB: paclitaxel is layered with an inert support (matrix or carrier) using a multi-layer technology, improving both its release and the persistence in the vessel wall; furthermore, significant improvements have been made to address the poor deliverability of first generation balloons.
In 2016 the Magic Touch, a new type of DCB has obtained, first, the CE mark for marketing in Europe; it is characterized by eluting sirolimus, a drug with potent inhibitory effect on cell growth, but with low lipophilicity. For this reason, its ability to penetrate the wall of the vessel is limited, and so far it has not been possible to develop a device that would allow an effective release, despite the drug is now known for years in cardiology.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •age at least 18
- •patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (including chronic stable angina, silent ischemia, acute coronary syndromes) with clinical indication to percutaneous coronary intervention.
排除标准
- •patients with one or more of the following criteria: known (and untreatable) hypersensitivity or contraindication to Aspirin, Heparin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor, Sirolimus, or a sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
- •patients enrolled in another trial.
- •Target lesion/vessel with any of the following characteristics:
- •successful pre-dilatation not performed in the target lesion, or not efficacious (residual stenosis >50%);
- •severe calcification of the target vessel, also proximal to the lesion;
- •highly tortuous lesions which can impair access of device to treatment site.
- •visible thrombus at lesion which is not treatable with aspiration.
结局指标
主要结局
Target lesion revascularization
时间窗: 12 months
repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion
次要结局
- very single component of major adverse cardiac events(6, 12, 24 and 36 months)
- Angiographic success(10 minutes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty)
- major adverse cardiac events(6, 12, 24 and 36 months)
- procedural success(up to 48 hours)
研究者
Bernardo Cortese
MD FESC
Fatebenefratelli and Ophthalmic Hospital
