跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02022631
NCT02022631已完成不适用

Comparison Between Standard and New Alternative Formats of the Summary-of-Findings Tables in Cochrane Review Users. A Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

McMaster University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 290 人开始时间: 2013年12月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
290
试验地点
1
主要终点
Understanding of key findings

研究概览

简要总结

The investigators will conduct a parallel two-armed, non-inferiority randomized trial comparing new alternative formats of summary of findings tables (SoF) tables with current formats. The investigators will contact Cochrane review users by email and will ask them to fill a questionnaire developed using the "Survey Monkey" online system. The survey will include questions about baseline information (demographic characteristics, background, number of visits to the Cochrane Library, familiarity with the GRADE system, etc.). Then, participants will be stratified (health professional, guideline developer, researcher) and randomly assigned to one of the two SoF table formats, either the alternative (Table A) or the current one (Table C). Participants will be asked to answer questions to determine understanding, accessibility, and satisfaction with the formats to which they were randomized. Finally, the investigators will show them the table format to which they were not initially allocated in order to test their preference for either one.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Cochrane review users
  • Authors of systematic reviews
  • Health professionals
  • Guideline developers
  • Researchers

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Alternative SoF

Experimental

Investigators will compare one SoF table with alternative formats (Table A) against one SoF table with the current formats (Table B). In both tables, the clinical question in terms of patients and setting, intervention, comparator, and outcomes informed by the tables, and the complementary information included as footnotes will be the same. The only differences between the current and alternative SoF table formats will be different methods to either show the same data in a different way or to provide complementary data to the one showed in the current format (i.e. supplementary data as risk difference).

干预措施: Alternative summary of findings table format (Other)

Current SoF

Active Comparator

Investigators will compare one SoF table with alternative formats (Table A) against one SoF table with the current formats (Table B). In both tables, the clinical question in terms of patients and setting, intervention, comparator, and outcomes informed by the tables, and the complementary information included as footnotes will be the same. The only differences between the current and alternative SoF table formats will be different methods to either show the same data in a different way or to provide complementary data to the one showed in the current format (i.e. supplementary data as risk difference).

干预措施: Current summary of findings table format (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Understanding of key findings

时间窗: 30 minutes

Investigators will frame multiple-choice questions about key concepts in the table with five response alternatives for each question and only one correct answer. Then, investigators will compare the proportion of correct answers between groups per question

次要结局

  • Accessibility of information(30 minutes)
  • Overall satisfaction(30 minutes)
  • Preference(30 minutes)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Holger Schunemann

MD, MSc, PhD

McMaster University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

New Alternative Formats vs Standard of SoF Tables.... | 临床试验